Here
is the list of all web pages which should
be available at this address (i.e. from this
server), arranged by language (in 8 languages).
It represents a more frequently updated version
of "Menu 1". Choose below the page that interests
you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
web page to run it:
(The same list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 2.)
Here is the list of addresses of all
totaliztic web sites that still worked
at the date of the most recent update
of this web page. At each of these addresses
should be available all totaliztic web pages
listed in "Menu 1" or
"Menu 2",
including also their different language versions
(i.e. versions in languages:
Polish, English, German, French, Spanish, Italian,
Greek or Russian.) Thus firstly select
the address which you wish to open by dragging
scroll bars in small window below, then click on
this address to run it. When opens the web
page which represents this address, then choose
from its "Manu 1" or
"Menu 2"
the web page which interests you and click on it
to view that page:
(The above list can also be displayed
from "Menu 1" by clicking
Menu 4.)
In the English language there is this excellent saying "you are what you
eat". If someone travelled through any two countries which practice
one amongst the best and one amongst the worst philosophies
of eating in the world, e.g. travelled through the USA and through
the South Korea, or through New Zealand and through Malaysia,
then he or she knows how vital truth is expressed by this English
saying. In spite of this, a majority of us mostly look for the taste
in whatever we eat. We tend to forget that apart of the taste, in
a healthy, nourishing, and energising food hides much more
important secrets. After all, food is not just for the taste and for
satisfying our hunger, but also for energising our bodies by
energies which Chinese call "yin" and "yang" (i.e. which decide
about our health and good feeling), as well as various healing,
stimulating, revitalising properties, etc., etc. Food are poisons
and cancer inducing substances with which immoral people
saturate food products. Food are also various additions forced
upon people by immoral decisions of governments. Etc., etc.
Therefore, it is about the time to start take notice these other
properties of foods. This web page presents some parts of this
knowledge which so-far come to the attention of the author,
but which typically are silenced, kept secret, or ignored in
present Western cultures.
The content of this web page is authorized by
Jan Pajak,
means by a researcher of New Zealand and Poland, and
WorldCat Identity
(see the web page http://worldcat.org/identities/),
who in the early part of 21st century stand out
from the crowd of still-living discoverers and
inventors of these two countries and he became
among them the most widely known in the world,
most variously interpreted, and at that time the
most productive - in spite of conducting his research
without funding and on the principles of a scientific
"hobby" forced by official disapproval of his research
area, although, unfortunately, about his existence
and results of research almost no-one wants to know
in New Zealand, while to annul, deny and mute down
his discoveries and inventions many inhabitants
of Poland conspire into gangs that act as monopolies
distorting the truth and trying to leave for future
generations only lies, trash, poisoned water, polluted
air, destroyed fertility of soil, and devastated nature.
Part #A:
Introductory information of this web page:
#A1.
The thesis and goal of this web page:
Motto:
"God approves and rewards in long-term only the research that
increases our knowledge of God and helps us to get to know everything
that God has created as well as helps us to utilise it in the way that
God approves, but God forbids and in long-term severely punishes
the research and implementations focused on introducing prohibited
by God changes to whatever God has created."
In spite that for many years I practiced habits of
a scientist, I always try to write in plain language all
of my web pages, including this web page - so that
they can be read and understood by ordinary people.
But because of these scientific habits, I still add to
the beginning of all my web pages a short summary
(abstract) of their content, as well as the formulation
of their goals. In turn, on this web page I exceptionally
added in this item the so-called "thesis" - the
truth of which thesis is proven by practically the content
of the entire of this web page. (This is because into
the content of this web page I included examples
of empirical evidence which support the truth of
this thesis.) The presence of thesis and the evidence
which proves it true, all together cause, that in spite
of being written in a plain language, in fact this web
page represents the same format that used to have
doctoral dissertations "in old good days" (i.e. in times
when the science has NOT yet descended to the dogs).
The thesis of this web page states:
all the components
from which are formed (and are kept alive) people
and also everything that people need to live, God
has created in such a way that these components
form "God’s masterpieces" in which the compositions,
configurations, structures, parameters, functions, etc.,
are the most perfect out of all possible outcomes that
could be obtained from given components - so that the
introduction by humans of any forbidden by God kinds
of changes to these "divine masterpieces" always
causes only worsening of level of their excellence.
Expressing in other words this thesis and the reason
why I stated it here on this web page, I try to provide
the empirical evidence which proves what the to-date
official science or the religions have NOT even tried
to prove. Namely, the evidence which proves that
all components of the people and of whatever
is necessary for the people to live (e.g. food and
beverages) God purposely designed, created and
grouped together so wisely and so well, that they
form wholes that are the most perfect out of all
outcomes possible to obtain. Therefore, if some
people, whose human-fallible knowledge makes them
total ignorants and idiots when compared with God’s
knowledge (e.g. present employees of the official
science, politicians, food industry, farmers, butchers,
fishermen, cooks, etc.) are to try to make any changes
or "improvements" that ruin in these "God's masterpieces"
the originally created by God composition, configuration,
structure, etc., then such changes or attempts of
"improvements" for sure are to cause only a significant
deterioration in the level of excellence of these masterpieces
and in their ability to support human health and life.
I probably do not need to add here, that - as in
every matter which is highly important for the
good of the people, God also warns us in the
Bible,
that everything He created (and thus, among others,
also the food that we eat and beverages that we
drink), He prepared for us in the most perfect way
possible. After all, only such a divine warning placed
in the Bible is able to clearly let to know all of the
humanity that if we (i.e. the imperfect people with
knowledge incomparably lesser than that of God)
will begin to change it or try to "improve" it, then the
only thing we get is the destruction of this "God's
masterpiece" and the spoiling of its beneficial effects
on our health and life (which beneficial effects God
originally bestowed to it). An example of just such
a divine warning is the
verse 1:31 from the Biblical "Genesis", which, after
describing the process of creation of the universe
and the people says: "And God saw everything
that He had made was very good." (In order
to draw people's attention to this weighty fact, that
whatever God created is already "very good", and
thus that people should NOT even attempt to change
it or to "improve" it, God repeats similar emphasizes
of quality (good) of the final products that He created
for several other stages (days) of creation.) In turn,
as we all know, there is NO the word that would mean
something even better than "very good". Furthermore,
behind of what God says always stands the authority
of divine omniscience and God’s infinitive capabilities.
Therefore, by stating that what He has created is
already "very good", God does NOT need to continue
to dwell in the Bible (as I am doing it here) that people
deprived of the divine omniscience and capabilities,
must NOT change or try to "improve" whatever God
has done as "very good", because they will spoil it.
After all, such a ban on making changes is obvious
and comes to mind by itself from the authority of God's
divine omniscience standing behind the term "very good".
(An example and an illustration of in how much trouble
the humanity falls if it starts to change and "improve"
whatever God has made "very good", are murderous
consequences of nuclear power, which probably already
threaten virtually every person with the danger of inducing
skin cancer, named "melanoma", and genetic mutations,
in case of someone just being soaked with ordinary rain.
After all, my research to-date described in item #F5 and
on "Fig. #F1abc" from the further part of this web page -
unfortunately, which research still is awaiting verification
and confirmation by other researchers, seem to reveal
that probably in every rain are contained individual droplets
of highly concentrated radioactive waste, the fall of which
droplets on the skin, is potentially threatening with causing
mutations and the "melanoma" cancer.)
Of course, the empirical proving of the truth of the
above thesis, obtained through providing the body of
evidence which I collected on this web page, introduces
many serious consequences. For example, it reveals
that whatever people do that causes changes in the
"God’s masterpiece" that are forbidden by God (e.g.
changes in the composition of it), it is always only a
next step towards the deterioration of the quality of whatever
for us (the humans) is absolutely necessary for life
and health. Thus, e.g. every change of the natural
composition of the foods we eat, or fluids that we drink,
made e.g. by the food industry, commands of politicians
or governments, greed of farmers, cunningness of
retailers, inventiveness of cooks, etc., always cause
only the reduction of the quality of these foods or liquids.
In other words, the consequence of proving the
abovementioned thesis is a warning: industrialists,
politicians, scientists, farmers, butchers, fishermen,
vendors, cooks, homegrown enhancers, etc.,
hands off the changing of
composition, genetics, condition, performance, etc.,
of whatever we eat and we drink. For every
change to the created by God forms of the food and
fluids required for us to live and to be healthy, through
e.g. their industrial processing, adding any chemicals
to it, altering their genetic composition, culturing on
ways different from natural, or changing them in any
ways described below in item #A4, turns this food
and fluids into slow-acting poisons that gradually
destroy human health and shorten people's lives -
as this is explained in item #T7 of my web page named
solar.htm.
From thesis of this web page stems also its main
goal. This goal can be stated as:
the combining together
examples of the most important types of empirical
evidence which indicates, that all the changes and
"improvements" that people introduce to the created
by God natural composition, condition, genetics,
growth, etc., of the food that we eat or fluids that
we drink, always causes the gradual destruction
of the natural ability of these products to support
and to nourish our health and life. In
other words, the goal of this web page is to confirm,
that everything that people are trying to change or
to "improve" in our foods and beverages created by
God, while the permission of making which changes
has NOT been positively acknowledged in the text
of the Bible, actually causes that these foods and drinks
are poisoned and spoiled, and thus that then they
become hazardous to our health and life.
#A2.
Why neither the atheistic science, nor the religions existing today,
so-far have NOT even tried to prove empirically nor warn us, that
the food which God created for us,
people must not change or try to "improve", because all human
changes made to the "God's masterpiece" cause only significant
poisoning and spoiling it, that eventually will destroy people:
Motto:
"Scientists whom introduce changes to what God has created and what
the people (ignorant in comparison with the knowledge of God) must not
change, are equally dangerous and destructive as leaders and politicians
who destroy and depopulate countries governed by them - unfortunately
both these categories of people rapidly multiply on Earth."
Today's official science virtually at every step
"stumbles" on examples of infinite perfection
of God's creations. After all, the configuration,
parameters, etc., of practically everything that
makes up the people and makes up whatever to
these people is essential for their life and health,
including food, are selected and combined
together by God in so narrowly allowed range,
that for accomplishing this was necessary the
infinitely higher than human wisdom and intelligence
of God just to so well match and align these creations.
(Notice that in order to continually NOT repeat
the words "food and drink" frequently used herein,
in every place of this web page when I write the
word "food", I recommend to understood this word
both as food for eating, and as drink for satisfying
thirst.) In fact, there also is a whole ocean of
situations and cases, which in a clear manner prove
to the researchers, that every change or attempt to
"improve" anything in whatever has been created
by God for the people, causes the rapid deterioration
of the quality of this creation - and thus brings
undesirable consequences for people. The entire
science and some scientists also sometimes act
as if subconsciously they are aware of the fact
that "God's masterpiece" people must not neither
change nor even try to "improve". After all, for
example, the establishing of various "seed banks"
both at the global level and in individual countries
is, amongst others, just such acting that tries to
protect against changing by the people of whatever
seeds God has created. Unfortunately for us, in spite of all this,
for many different reasons, the institution of present
official science as a whole (i.e. as the so-called "group
intellect") still cannot somehow get itself to develop
and to announce the conclusion, that "God's
masterpiece" people must not attempt to change
nor "improve", because all such attempts always
end up only with spoiling it. So let us list here and
describe several amongst most significant examples
of these different reasons. Here they are:
(1) The official lying by the science (treated as a whole),
that God does NOT exist. In order to prove that
"God's masterpiece", especially food, people must
not change or "improve", one needs firstly prove
that "God does exist" (as I did it, amongst others,
in item #G2 from my web page named
god_proof.htm).
However, the atheistic institution of present official
science claims that God does NOT exist. Thus, by
definition, this science cannot draw the conclusion, that
people must not change or try to "improve" the "God's
masterpiece", especially food - although such a conclusion
increasingly loudly arises by itself from the more and more
obviously devastating for the people results of the changes
and "improvements" that the official science already has
introduced to that food.
(2) Greed what dominates over good of humans.
Lucrative lives that lead today's official science and its
scientists in charge, are only achieved because the
science and scientists get funding from governments
just to change or to "improve" whatever God has
created - including food. Thus, the statement that
"God's masterpiece", particularly food, people must
not change nor "improve" would be for the official
science like the "cutting off
the tree-branch on which this science sits".
(3) The lack of definition. So far, there was NO
definition yet, as to what actually constitutes the disallowed
for the people "change" or attempt to "improve" of whatever
in this item I call "God's masterpiece" - including the change
in state, composition, performance, genetics, etc., of foods.
In other words, there still was NO the definition yet as to
what people must not change (i.e. there was NO the
definition similar to that one which I am providing in item
#A3 of this web page). In turn without such a definition,
people typically are unable to distinguish, for example,
unnatural and therefore disallowed "changes" or attempts
to "improve" foods (i.e. the saturation of foods with mineral
chemicals, genetic modifications of foods, etc.), from the
natural and permitted by God preparation of food for
consumption (i.e. from washing it, cutting, fermenting,
sprinkling with salt, cooking, combining together longer
menus out of different natural foods, distribution, serving,
etc.), and from growing it up and multiplying it - that is,
e.g. from planting, natural fertilization, grafting of fruit
trees (but only carried out without changing their kind -
i.e. NOT including, for example, the proverbial grafting
"pears on willows"),
and the like. After all, some natural preparation of food
for consumption and the growth and multiplication of food,
also by a lot of people may be wrongly classified as a
"change" or an attempt to "improve" - although in terms
of the objectives for which it serves in fact it is a completely
different category from the "change" category of human
activities. After all, the preparation for consumption
represents only the various examples from a wide
range of legitimate uses, to which the subjecting of this
"God's masterpiece" is allowed in the Bible, so that food
can be multiplied and used for the good of humans.
In turn religions do NOT even try to prove anything
that would advance the human awareness to a new
level - including e.g. trying to prove that "God's
masterpieces", particularly foods, people must not
change or try to improve. All the attention of today's
religions is in fact converged on extending the life
of their own religious institutions and on multiplying
their followers.
At this point, I also have a duty to stress emphatically
that the incompetence of previous developments, and
thus also the certainty of the future avoiding by the
official science and by religions of so much needed
informing, that "God's masterpiece" (especially food)
people must not neither change nor even try to "improve",
causes that people still continue introduction of devastating
changes to whatever they are NOT allowed to change.
It is because of this continuing, that starting from
11th of September 2001 the humanity crossed the
"point of NO return"
in its efforts to commit suicide and now it gradually is dying -
as this is explained more broadly in items #T1 to #T8
from my web page named
solar.htm.
#A3.
Let us define for ourselves as to what constitutes a "change"
or an attempt to "improve" of what God has created for our
consumption and what here I call "God's masterpiece" - that
is the composition, condition, genetics, etc., of what people
must not change or attempt to "improve":
There is a whole range of important premises,
all of which relatively accurately reveal to us, what
changes in "God's masterpiece" people must NOT made.
The most important source of these premises is the
Bible.
After all, it is in the Bible that God authoritatively states
that everything that He created is "very good" - that is,
that beings (people) deprived of the divine omniscience
and powers should NOT even try to change it, because
they only spoil it. Also in the Bible are clearly separated
from each other two different categories of actions to
which can be subjected, among others, food, i.e. (1) the
creation of its "very good" composition, state, content,
functions, etc. (i.e. whatever people must NOT change),
from (2) its uses for human good and its multiplication
(i.e. what people are allowed to do and what God
is recommending to be done). Another source of
such premises is the finding of the
philosophy of totalizm.
This finding has revealed, that absolutely everything
that people do, and thus also the human handling of foods,
can be made either (1) in a manner violating the God's
commandments (i.e. "immorally"), or (2) in a manner consistent
with the God's orders (i.e. morally) - as ibriefly summarize
these two opposite human ways of doing things the items
#B2 and #B1 from the web page named "cooking.htm". (In
other words, the philosophy of totalizm teaches us, that it is NOT
true what practices the present official science, namely that
scientists, politicians and people in general, are permitted
to "change" everything, to changing of whatever they have
a desire, for if they "change" something what God does NOT
allow them to change, then God sends a severe punishment.) The logic,
a common sense, and typical life experience, also are sources
of premises which quite clearly suggest to us, that nothing
that someone with the knowledge and experience higher than
ours has already made "very good" (thus also all these characteristics
of food, which were granted to it by God at the stage of creation)
we must NOT change or "improve", because of our inferior
knowledge and experience only is to spoil it. (For example,
in item #B1 of my autobiographical web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm,
I described as still as a little boy I succumbed to temptations
that after my father was leaving to his work, I was dismantling
"very good" Swiss-made watches, which my father fix only the
night before - and, of course, having no knowledge and experience
of my father, I only spoiled these watches again.) But the most
convincing source of premises revealing what changes in
"God's masterpiece" people must not make, is a long list of such
changes already made by people, that ended up poisoning and
breaking down of "God's masterpieces" - such a list for foods
I provided below in next item #A4 of this web page, while the
detailed descriptions of poisoning and spoiling of "God's masterpiece"
that such changes cause in foods, are presented in further
parts of this web page. All these premises put together quite
precisely reveal to us how we should define these changes
and attempts to "improve" foods, that people must not make,
because they only ruin "God's masterpiece" of creation of
the foods which can be described with the divine expression
"very good". Therefore, on the basis of all these premises
I have already prepared the necessary definition and I present
it below. Here it is:
The disallowed
for carrying out by humans change or an attempt
to "improve" foods, should be named any change
in genetics, the manner of growing, composition,
distribution, method of food preparation for human
consumption, or in compiling multi-course meals
from different types of food, which a change is to
cause the acquiring by this food any modified attributes
that are different from those of originally pre-programmed
by God in a given kind of food, or modified attributes which are NOT
approved by God through listing in the Bible the
examples of their positive use.
In other words, with food people are permitted to
do anything, which leaves unchanged the characteristics
that God pre-programmed in it for us at the stage of
creation, and/or to do anything that is positively mentioned
in the Bible. For example, in every possible way it is
permitted to cut food, pulverize it, squeeze, extract,
smash, choose for eating only its components, ferment,
boil, sprinkle with salt, dry, etc. Very carefully (i.e. in
ways that comply with a number of specific genre and
energy rules – e.g. see items #L1, #L2 and #L3 from
this web page), a given kind of food can also be mixed
with other similarly natural kinds of food, or can
be included into extended menus that are composed
of many dishes containing different types of foods.
However, with food completely we are NOT allowed
to do what I specified in item #A4 of this web page,
and what then I described in more details in other
items of this web page - means to do whatever precisely
meets the above definition of disallowed for people
changes or attempts to "improve" food. This is because
making such forbidden changes transforms food into
a slow-acting poison which gradually kills its consumers.
I should also add here that the above definition
stems from the current stage of my research and
the current state of my knowledge. However,
realizing my human imperfection, my research
into compliance of the above definition, with what
reveals to us the surrounding reality, is still to be
continued. After all whatever imperfect humans
do can also be further enhanced by the selected
people that already possessed the required for
these improvements level of wisdom, knowledge
and experience. So if in the future I discover
that this definition in some place is NOT sufficiently
correct, accurate, or clear, then I am to perfect
it further.
I also encourage the reader, that he/she verifies
the correctness and clarity of this definition, both on
the evidence which I am presenting on this web page,
as well as on any other evidence which the reader
is able to find (in spite, that probably this evidence
is going to be officially hidden by scientists and by
politicians). If the reader finds out, that this definition
in his/her opinion should be further improved - then I
would appreciate letting me know "why", "where"
and possibly also "how".
#A4.
Let us also list here examples of key categories of "changes" or attempts
to "improve" introduced by humans to food and beverages, about which
already now we can determine, that they impair their quality by turning
them into poisons slowly destroying the health and killing humans who consume them:
Ignorance and the atheism of scientists and
official science, combined with the to-date lack
of definition which only my research allowed to
publish in previous item #A3, caused that people
routinely make changes and attempts to "improve"
foods that are ruining the characteristics given
to food by God at the stage of creation - and
thus which the people should not make. As a
result, more and more often it is discovered
that another one amongst these changes or
"improvements", previously determined by
science as "allowed" or "needed", turns food
into a slow-acting poison. Thus, on entire this
web page I gathered together the most important
examples when the changes, that scientists
say are supposedly "allowed" or "recommended",
have already proved to be "poisonous" for the
food - while in this item here I try to summarize
these fatal changes.
Thus, the most important examples of such changes
and attempts at "improvement" of foods that are
disallowed to be made by people, as they turn
these foods into slowly acting poisons, include:
(I) The introduction into food of any quantity and types
of mineral chemicals that naturally do NOT occur
in a particular kind of food, and thus that must be
produced by today's factories (but note that salt is
here the exception). Especially the introduction of
mineral types of chemicals described on this web page.
For example, the introduction of chemicals (described
in item #C1 of this web page), which intend to kill
micro-organisms attacking a given food, which micro-organisms
cause the spoilage of that food or change in its colour.
After all, the introduction of such chemicals ignores the
quite obvious conclusion, which probably already come
to mind of the reader, and which states that
if any chemicals kill the
micro-organisms that cause spoilage of food or cause
a change in the colour of that food, then the same chemicals
certainly also kill the beneficial micro-organisms which in our
body cause the digestion of this food and which assist in
absorbing through our body the needed by us ingredients of
that food (in other words - the introduction
of these chemicals to food ignores the rather obvious conclusion
that these chemicals do NOT just kill the micro-organisms,
but they slowly and gradually also kill the people who
consume them).
(Ii) Any industrial food processing that adds to it, or
creates in it, any kind of chemicals or components
that originally were NOT present in the given kind of
food. An example is the industrial processing of
red-meat - which turns this meat into a carcinogenic
substance described in item #T7 from my web page named
solar.htm
(i.e. into the substance, eating of which the official
WHO report qualified to the same dangerous to life
and health category, as eating radioactivity or inhalation
of asbestos).
(III) The irradiation of food intended for consumption by
any type of radiation that naturally do NOT reach the
Earth (e.g. because normally such a radiation is stopped
by the Earth's atmosphere), or allowing that the eaten
food comes in contact with radioactive substances.
Examples here is the use of radiation at the borders of
countries to kill insects and their eggs, or to destroy the
usefulness of the grain as material for sowing (e.g. in
imported fruit or crops), the use of microwave ovens,
eating or selling food that grows under high-voltage AC
lines, etc.
(IV) The introduction to the food of any substance used
by humans also separately as medicines, drugs, hormones,
steroids, etc. For example, feeding chickens with
antibiotics or injections of antibiotics into
kiwifruit,
adding vitamins to bread, adding calcium to milk, adding
fluoride to the drinking water in public waterworks, add
bromine to water in the water supply (e.g. to calm the
riots), and the like.
(V) Causing the growth of food on plants or in soil treated
with any kind of pesticides or other toxic chemicals.
After all, e.g. pesticides, and also toxic chemicals or elements
contained e.g. in artificial fertilizers, are substances particularly strongly
breaking the moral criteria (i.e. are immoral substances) -
for whose introduction into general use God already jointly
and severely punishes the entire humanity - for details see
item #T7 from the web page named
solar.htm,
and item #J1 from the web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm.
(VI) Such preparation or combining food that destroys
its nutritional and energizing abilities. For example, deep freezing, ionising, electrifying,
ruining the balance of "yin" and "yang" energy during
food preparation - examples provided in items #L1 to #L3
from this web page, or items #B2 to #B4 from the web
page named
fruit.htm.
(VII) Genetic changes carried out in plants or animals
that produce food (i.e. the so-called "genetic engineering").
For details see "part #G" of this web page.
(VIII) Causing the growth of food on "composite" plants
or animals, i.e. on such in which the individual parts
have genetics that differ from each other. To this
group of changes or "improvements" of foods prohibited
for people are included any equivalents of the proverbial
"growing pears on willows" - means, for example,
the modern methods of grafting of fruit trees at the "root
base" which is formed by planting firstly a fast- growing
types of woods that are different than the fruit trees that later are to
be grafted. In other words, the proverbial pears are only
allowed to be grafted and grow on pear trees - i.e. on the
"root bases" which are also formed from pear trees. (Just
such forbidden "composite" fruit trees are now in New Zealand
the majority of all the trees that provide fruit for human
consumption, and are almost an exclusive type of seedlings
of fruit trees that can be purchased in New Zealand garden
shops – no wonder that even the freshly harvested and
clean fruits still can be poisonous in present times.)
Please note that the above list so far includes only
the most important changes and attempts to "improve"
foods. Thus, in the future I will wide it and supply it with
broader explanations - of course, as my free time will
permit this.
#A5.
So how we can defend ourselves and our loved ones
from the harmful impact on our health and life of all these forbidden changes and
the supposed "improvements" already introduced by other people to modern foods and beverages:
Motto:
"For the wages sin pays is death" (Bible, Romans, verse 6:23)
Theoretically speaking, a defence against the
harmful effects of introducing disallowed for
people changes and "improvements" to foods,
and thus a defence against death due to
a slow poisoning with today's foods, looks
easy. It is enough to just avoid eating such
changed (supposedly "improved") foods, i.e.
to avoid purchasing and eating foods the packages
of which reveal a long list of mineral supplements
or medicines, foods industrially processed -
especially if we ourselves are able to prepare
an unprocessed, home alternative to food
produced in a "factory-style" (e.g. to chicken and
poultry from large "cage farms", caged pigs,
ready meals or sandwiches from mass dining
outlets type McDonald's or Pizza Hut), etc., etc.
In fact, I myself already started this kind of defence.
But as it turns out, in practice this defence is
very difficult - as on the basis of my own practical
experience is explained in more details in items
#T7 and #T8 from my web page named
solar.htm.
This difficulty stems from the fact that nowadays
practically is almost impossible to purchase foods
that have NOT been previously poisoned in
one of these numerous disallowed ways described
in item #A4 above. Even if what we eat is prepared
by ourselves from the most basic ingredients, such
as flour, potatoes, bread, milk, slices of meat, eggs,
etc. - still increasingly often we only can purchase
ingredients which for some reason someone -
who produces or sells them (e.g. a farmer, butcher,
fisherman, miller, baker, salesman, etc.) tainted with
some slowly working poisons. An additional difficulty
to this defence is also that it introduces the necessity
of sacrificing, and eliminating from our lives, almost
all the conveniences and supposed achievements
which our present technical civilization already have
developed - as this is explained in item #T8 from the
abovementioned web page
solar.htm.
Examples of the principles and methods of defence
which I already tried on myself, are described in more
detail in items #T6 and #T7 from my web page named
solar.htm.
But regardless of the fact that the defence against
such food poisoning turns out in practice to be very
difficult, still this defending should be carried
out strongly - for several different reasons. For
example, the overriding reason is to prove to God
that we are NOT a passive "partner" in the "conspiracy
of silence" that now is wrapping this massive immorality
of food poisoning to satisfy someone’s greed - as it is
broadly described in item #N2 from the web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm.
In turn the personal reason stems from the fact that
"the point of NO return" is already passed by
mankind and now our present civilisation is in the
process of dying - as I explained this "down to earth"
in items #T1 to #T7 from my web page named
solar.htm.
Thus, we need to avoid eating slow-acting poisons simply
in order to prevent the inclusion of ourselves and our
families to the group of people who will become extinct
along with quickly incoming death of the current form
of our civilization.
Part #B:
Problems with present foods:
#B1.
Food, similarly like everything else in the physical world, has its good and bad sides:
Motto:
"If a typical consumer knew how was prepared and what really contains
the food that he or she eats, then would never take this food to the mouths."
Items #E2 and #G1 of this web page explain
to us that in the physical world (in which
we all live) literally nothing has just good or
just bad consequences. In other words,
consequences of everything are in our world
a mixture of good and bad. Therefore also in
matters of food we must remember that apart
satisfying our hunger and acquiring various
pleasures, food and eating are also a source
of various evils. Thus in our own interest lies
to learn also about this evil that stems from
food and from eating, and to learn how to avoid
consequences of this evil.
Examples of problems and bad sides of present
food and cooking include, amongst others, a drop
in taste, fattening tendencies, inducing allergies
and diseases (e.g. diabetes), persuading people
towards a moral fall-down, the contribution
towards world's hunger and death of the entire
human civilisation, and many further disasters
which are secondary to these mentioned above.
#B2.
The morality dictates, that each of us actively defend
food and beverages which we consume from corrupting
their level of quality created by God:
Both, on this web page, as well as on many
others that I am authoring, I try to remind
the readers that everything that people do, even
producing and serving the food, can be carried
out either in accordance with the criteria of morality,
means "morally",
or "immorally".
But somehow it so it happens, that in today's highly
immoral times of "neo-medieval epoch",
people increasingly frequent are making decisions
to do in an immoral way almost everything - as I am
generally explaining this in item #J1 of my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2014.htm,
while I support this with specific examples, amongst
others, in items #A1, #B5 and #F3 from my web page named
solar.htm,
item #N2 from my web page named
solar.htm,
or in items #I1 and #I2 from my web page named
healing.htm.
Thus, even in such everyday and ordinary matter
as the food and the eating of it, every immoral
person adds his/her contribution to the direct
and intentional harming of other people, while
having NO idea that actually indirectly and
unintentionally he/she is harming himself/herself.
So let us all begin to be aware and this fact. I do
hope, that through writing this web page, I am to
inspire readers to action in raising this awareness.
I also hope that this web page is to inspire the
reader to write his or her own personal "cookbook"
with recipes of tasty, traditional native (and, if
possible also oriental) dishes, which beneficial
effect on health has been proven for centuries
of their eating by our ancestors, and thus, the
goodness given to them by God was NOT spoiled
by people, and which continue to have the balanced
energies of yin and yang.
Part #C:
The negative impact of the "monopole for knowledge" of the official science on the situation in foods:
#C1.
All problems with foods are secondary - the primary cause of these problems is the
"monopole for knowledge" of the stubbornly erroneous "atheistic orthodox science":
If we carefully consider the matter, then it
turns out that all most vital problems of our
present world, including problems with foods
described on this web page, originate from
the fact, that present "atheistic orthodox science"
(i.e. the official science which defines what
we are learning in schools and at universities)
holds the absolute "monopole for knowledge".
This is because this science does NOT have
any "competition" which would "look it at hands"
and verify the truth and values of whatever present
scientists irresponsibly are claiming. So this
science arrogantly "tells lies to us" in ever
increasing number of areas.
In order to illustrate here the link between an absolute
"monopole for knowledge" which is held by the
to-date "atheistic orthodox science" and problems
with foods which are described on this web page,
I am going to explain here briefly how works the
cause-effect chain between this "monopole for
knowledge" and present problems with foods.
And so, the sole fact that the present official
science practices an "institutional atheism",
and that in spite of the existence of a huge number of
scientific evidence for the existence of God
this official science uncritically insists that supposedly
"God does NOT exist", causes that the official science
overlooks the link between what happens on the earth
and the human so-called "morality". Means, it overlooks
everything that is explained e.g. on the web page named
morals.htm
or on the web page named
seismograph.htm.
This causes tha failing to educate people about the
truly immense role of morality. In turn failing to educate
people about the true role of morality causes that
humans become increasingly "less moral" (or more
"immoral"). In turn this human "immorality" causes
that e.g. in matters of food commonly is practiced
a "double standard". For example, "for ourselves"
food producers typically produce now one kind of
food, while completely different food they produce
"for sale". (I.e. "for ourselves" they produce food
which is clean, fresh, "organic" - means deprived
of chemicals, antibiotic, pesticides, genetic
engineering, etc. In turn "for sale" they produce
food which is poisoned with "everything that they
can get away without being punished".) Of course,
since almost all immoral producers of food practice
such principles, politicians have NO other choice
by to rectify such laws and requirements that allow
these producers to pollute our foods.
#C2.
How the lonely baobab from the Malaysian island of Penang documents
the destructive ignorance of science resulting from the "monopole on knowledge":
Motto:
"Your fences eat your
rice" (i.e. a proverb from
Malaysia which reminds to us the old truth that those
ones who are paid for implementing something, typically
with the elapse of time become the biggest enemies of
this something, e.g. "monopolistic science becomes the
biggest enemy of progress and truth", "complacent
politicians become biggest obstacles in solving problems
of a given country", "greedy bankers become most
important cause of every economic crisis", "powerful
priests become the biggest enemies of truth and
knowledge about God", etc., etc. - NOT
without an important reason God emphasized this
old truth to us by causing that Jesus was send to
death by high priests). For more details
see item #E3 from my web page named
pajak_for_mp_2017.htm -
explaining consequences of "100% corruption".
The matter of pollination and procreation of
flowers and trees, is NOT only elementary,
but also it is researched by entire crowds
of present expensive scientists. So we are
believing that in this matter there are NO
puzzles left, while scientists so heavily
subsidised from our taxes know already
practically everything on this subject. So
no-one is surprised by nonchalant statements
of scientists, that commonly known African
trees called "baobabs", are pollinated at
nights NOT by wind or insects, but by "fruit
bats". After all, in spite that "bats" are rather
unusual kind of "pollinators", this information
with the high certainty is published by present
scientists literally in hundreds of works and
sources - e.g. the reader can find it in almost
every web page devoted to baobabs. However,
the truth is such, that this claim of science is just
a "huge pile of bullshit". In reality baobabs are
NOT pollinated as scientists claim it, nor procreate
in the way as science describes this to us.
In fact, the official human science (i.e. the
science which by some is called the "atheistic
orthodox science" or "official atheistic
science") still does NOT have any clue
how baobabs really are pollinated and how
they really procreate. (More information
about this old "official atheistic science",
which still desperately clings to its absolute
"monopole for knowledge" - although uses just
a single, highly limited, and erroneous approach
to research by philosophers called "a posteriori",
the reader can learn from item #A2.6 of the web page
totalizm.htm,
item #C1 of the web page named
telekinetics.htm,
item #J2 of the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm,
and items #F1.1 to #F3 of the web page named
god_exists.htm.
Reading that information the reader will learn a
bitter truth explained above in item #C1, namely
that "all problems of our civilisation are
secondary consequences of the fatal 'monopole
for knowledge' so possessively held by the 'atheistic
orthodox science' to date".) There is even
an illustrative proof which everyone can check,
and which documents that "fruit bats do NOT
pollinate baobabs". For the use of readers,
I am going to describe now this proof.
On the Malaysian island of Penang lives a lonely,
large, single (female) baobab, over 140 years old -
see a photograph of it shown below in "Fig. #C1ab".
One can find this baobab in the middle of a rondo
especially build over there to protect it on the junction
of three streets named "Jalan Macalister", "Jalan
Residensi" and "Jalan Pangkor". About this baobab
from the Malaysian island of Penang a lot of legends
and funny stories is told, e.g. that it was brought
to Penang and planted in there by a strange traveller
with capabilities of the famous "magician" named
David Copperfield, or that when it rapidly releases
the excess of water accumulated in its tissues
then local people believe a miracle happens and
pray to it (supposedly then their prayers are even
answered). But the most mysterious attribute of
that lonely baobab from the Malaysian island of
Penang is, that in spite of blooming generously,
it never produces fruits from which its descendants
could grow. In the result, until today it has NOT
produced a descendant in Malaysia. This its inability
to multiply is also documenting the ignorance
of present scientists. Namely, present "atheistic
orthodox scientists" complacent in their armchairs
(as they are described in items #F1 to #F3 from
a separate web page named
god_exists.htm,
and also reminded in item #D3 of this web page),
nonchalantly express unverified opinion, that in
order to pollinate baobabs it suffices that fruit bats
feed at night on their flowers. However, on the
island of Penang live tropical fruit bats and for
sure many of them feed on flowers of the discussed
baobab. But still this baobab remains not pollinated
and still it does NOT produce fruits capable of
generating new trees. In other words, similarly
as this is the case with humans, in order to
produce descendants, probably are necessary
at least two unrelated baobab trees - which mutually
for each other perform functions of a husband
and wife (i.e. perform male and female functions).
So in this matter, baobabs clearly are similar to
trees of Malaysian "durian" fruit (i.e. the fruit
described in item #G1 of the web page named
fruit.htm) -
which also can multiply and produce fruits only
if close to each other grow at least two mutually
unrelated durian trees. So when a next time we
read ignorant claims of present "official atheistic
science" on the subject of pollination of baobabs
by tropical fruit bats, it is worth to have in memory
this lonely female baobab tree from Penang,
which produces flowers and which is visited
by fruit bats, but because there is no male
tree around to fertilise these flowers, thus,
unfortunately, even after over 140 years of
flowering it still failed to produce fruits -
thus until today it remains in Malaysia
without having its own descendants.
This Malaysian lonely baobab from the island of
Penang is NOT the only case when the atheistic
orthodox science "tells nonsense" to naive people,
thus causing cataclysmic changes on the Earth
the repairs of which are going to occupy the
humanity for hundreds, if not for thousands, of
years. Examples of next lies and nonsense also
spread amongst people by the official science
deprived of any "competition" thus having no-one
who would "look it at hands" and make sure it tells
the truth, as well as deprived of any moral breaks,
include, amongst others:
1.
Lies regarding God - i.e. lies that supposedly there are
NO scientific proofs that God really exists. These
are obvious lies of the "official atheistic science", as that
there is a large body of scientific proofs and evidence
which all unambiguously confirm that God really
exists. Some amongst these proofs and evidence
are described on the totaliztic web page named
god_proof.htm -
especially see the incontestable formal proof for the
existence of God completed with the method of mathematical
logic and published in item #G2 of the "god_proof.htm" web page.
2.
"Holding heads in sand" in matters of UFOs. The
official atheistic science refuses to research UFOs
and pretends that there are NO objective evidence
and proofs for the existence of UFOs - as this is
explained more comprehensively in item #B1 from
the web page named
ufo_proof.htm.
On the other hand, there is a wealth of such evidence
and proofs. The only problem with UFOs depends on
the fact that UFOnauts do NOT want to cooperate
with human scientists, while our scientists are too ignorant
and too arrogant to be able to research something that
intelligently refuses to cooperate with them. In the
result, scientists are too afraid that their ignorance
"comes to surface" during the research on UFOs,
so they avoid the subject of UFOs like "devils avoid
holy water".
3.
Ignorance of scientists in matters of phenomena that
lie beyond the textbook knowledge and beyond the to-date
understanding of the world around them, e.g. phenomena such as
telekinesis,
telekinetics,
telepathy,
etc. This ignorance result from the
stubborn ignoring and rejecting my scientific
Theory of Everything of 1985 (also called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity)
which explains these phenomena unknown to the
official science, and which simultaneously proves the
existence of God.
4.
Complete blindness of science and its stand regarding
"fabrications" such as "bones of dinosaurs" as well
as regarding conventional dating of geological structures.
Much wider explanation what this error and blindness
of science regarding the "bones of dinosaurs" is all
about, is offered, amongst others, in item #H2 of
the web page named
god_istnieje.htm
as well as in the web page named
evolution.htm.
5.
The spread of "scientific nonsense", like for example
the "theory of the Big Bang" which implies that "the entire
universe supposedly originates from nothing". The wider
discussion of the error of this scientific claim that "the
entire universe originates from nothing" is provided in
(5) from item #C12 of the web page named
bible.htm
as well as in the web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm.
6.
The lack of knowledge and ignorance of the official
science in even most elementary matters, for example
"what is gravity", "how the universe eventuated",
"what is the goal of our existence", "what states
the most simple recommendation for the correct
life, which is effective and proves itself working
in every life situation", "what 'morality' really is",
etc., etc.
On the other hand, the new "totaliztic science" already
provided us with explanations and answers to these
matters - only that dissemination of these explanations
and answers is jealously blocked by the "official
atheistic science" which greedily guards its "monopole
on knowledge". For example, to learn "what is gravity"
see the web page named
dipolar_gravity.htm,
for learning "how the universe eventuated" see subsections
A1 to A6 from volume 1 of my newest
monograph [1/5]
(summarised briefly in item #E1 of the web page named
will.htm),
for learning "what is the goal of our existence" see item #B4 of the web page
tornado.htm,
for learning "what states the most simple recommendation
for correct life, which is effective and proves itself
working in every life situation" see the discussion of
the "only principle of totalizm" stating that "whatever
you do always do it in a pedantically moral way"
provided in item #C1 from the web page named
totalizm.htm,
for learning "what 'morality' really is" see item #B5 from the web page named
morals.htm,
etc., etc.
7.
Biased approach, ignorance, arrogance, and a complete
lack of progress in solving by the official science the most
burning issues of our present civilisation. On the
other hand this new "totaliztic science", in spite of its
acting without any finances while being almost continually
persecuted by the official science, already by now
managed to find and to indicate to people solutions for
the majority of these problems - for examples of these
solutions see web pages named
seismograph.htm, item #B5 (for earthquakes),
day26.htm, item #I3 (for tsunamis),
tornado.htm (for tornadoes),
telekinetics.htm (for new sources of energy),
eco_cars.htm (for air pollution),
2030_uk.htm (for approaching THe Great Purification),
etc., etc.
8.
The silent approval for murderous and immoral activities
of secretive atomic industry which in its "peaceful
use of atomic energy" is probably the biggest killer
of people (including inhabitants of own countries).
For more information on manners in which "peaceful
use of atomic energy" secretly kills people (including
inhabitants of their own countries) see items #F1 to
#F2 below on this web page, and also items #M1 to
#M1.3 on the web page named
telekinetics.htm,
items #C7 and #I1 on the web page named
seismograph.htm,
or item #F3 of the web page named
god_exists.htm.
(Notice also fates that are served to passive nations
which provide "silent approvals" for immoral activities -
described in items #B1 and #B4 from the web page named
parasitism.htm
and item #C7 from the web page named
seismograph.htm.)
9.
The reinforcement by scientists of the culture of unpunished
lying and misleading of people. If an engineer builds
a bridge or a house which collapses and kills anyone,
then usually he lands in a prison. If a medical doctor
kills anyone with his medicines or erroneous diagnosis,
then at least he is struck out of register. But if a
scientist spreads lies under an excuse of scientific
research, then he does NOT bear any consequences.
In fact, probably no-one ever heard of a scientist
who would bear responsibility for lying or for misleading
people. On the other hand such a situation gives
a bad example to other people, because it spreads
and reinforces the culture of unpunished lying and
misleading. It would be with a benefit to the morality
and to truth when also scientists were taking responsibility
for the moral consequences and for the truth of whatever
they state publicly. The problem of an immense importance
of spreading the truth, even this most unpopular and
persecuted (after all, "without learning the truth there
is NO progress"), and the problem of responsibility of
scientists for the spread of truth, is discussed on a
number of totaliztic web pages. For examples of these -
see item #F1 from the web page named
totalizm.htm,
item #K1 from the web page named
morals.htm,
or item #E1 from the web page named
will.htm.
10.
Blind believing that the human civilisation already discovered
and invented everything that could be discovered and
invented. Thus, for example, overlooking that in the
area of propulsion systems the humanity is only at the level
of "second technical era", while for propelling devices God
designed as many as six such technical eras - for details
see items #J4.1 to #J4.6 from the web page named
propulsion.htm -
or see the 35 minutes long free YouTube video entitled
Future Propulsions.
Photographs and descriptions of this lonely baobab
from the Malaysian island of Penang, which (baobab)
illustratively documents the ignorance of present
official science in even so elementary matters as
pollination and procreation of trees so well known
to all of us, are also presented in item #F4.4 and
in "Fig. #F1ab" from the web page named
stawczyk_uk.htm.
(a)
(b)
Fig. #C1ab: Unexplained scientific
puzzle and a symbol of supernatural mysteries
- means a lonely "baobab" from the
Malaysian island of Penang. It is a "living proof"
that the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date
disseminates a lot of rubbish on a significant
number of topics that it researches. (For a
different example among such "living proofs"
see "part #I", i.e. #I1 to #I7, from my web page named
sw_andrzej_bobola_uk.htm -
which indicates evidence that God created
more than one set of chemical elements about
which we learn in schools and universities from
"Mendeleev's Table",
but out of which the offcial atheistic science recognises
only the most primitive such set.) The point
is, that the above baobab meets all requirements
which according to the "atheistic orthodox science"
to-date must be fulfilled for a baobab to produce
fruits and to multiply. But in spite of it, this particular
baobab neither produces fruits nor multiplies
(although it blooms almost continually). This in
turn means, that baobabs still hide a lot of mysteries
and supernatural attributes, which real explaining
must await until the time when the humanity firstly
establishes officially a new "totaliztic science" (i.e.
the science which is NOT afraid to explain mysteries) -
as this is described in item #C1 on the web page named
telekinetics.htm.
(Click on the selected photograph to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C1a (upper):
A photograph of the entire baobab tree. Notice
the information plate visible as it extends on the
left side of the photograph, above the fence which
surrounds the tree. In July 2011 this plate stated,
quote: "This tree, a native of Abyssinia, was
planted in 1871 by Captain Speedy, a soldier of
fortune. Baobabs are low spreading trees, flowers
pendulous and white. Fruits hairy, oblong of
about 30 cm. It can live up to 2,000 years. The
fat bottle-shaped trunks become hollow as the
trees age, some can hold as much as 5,000
litres of water. The natives of Africa used them
as storage chambers. Many African chiefs
were buried in the hollowed trunks of such
trees. Baobab trees are rich in pulp suitable
for use in paper industry.") As usually it is
the case with official information, in July 2011
this plate stated whatever is obvious and known
to almost everyone, but avoided mentioning of
whatever in this baobab is the most important.
Fig. #C1b (lower):
A flower (around 20 cm in length) photographed
on 27 July 2011 on the baobab described here
from the Malaysian island of Penang. The presence
of this flower proves, that if baobabs really are
pollinated at nights by "fruit bats" - as naively
claims it the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date,
then this lonely baobab from the island of Penang
would have fruits and it would NOT exist in Malaysia
for so many years without producing any descendants.
Unfortunately, as usually, orthodox scientists "tell rubbish"
on this subject and, as usually, probably it turns necessary
that the new "totaliztic science" carries out factual
research to explain how baobabs really multiply.
I should mention, that since most probably there
will always be obstacles in official planting in Penang
another baobab tree, while seeds of these trees can
easily be ordered by anyone via internet (see
https://www.google.com/search?q=baobab+seeds),
and also seeds of this tree are very nutritious and
tasty - means good for the impending times of
disasters and hunger, perhaps
it would be a good idea if someone local spends
his/her private dollars and plants a few more baobab
trees near this lonely one from Penang.
Part #D:
Residues of pesticides in foods:
#D1.
Immoral overdoing with pesticides in "foods for sale":
A significant proportion of food producers
"for sale" typically do NOT take notice of all
warning signs, that pesticides induce cancer
and many other illnesses in people which
eat this food. So they generously spread
with pesticides all food that they produce -
after all this food NOT supposed to be for
their "own consumption". In turn factories
which earn billions on sale pesticides exert
a strong pressure on politicians so that these
delay and make difficult any introduction of
laws that would limit the use of these murderous
chemicals.
At this point it is worth to mention, that in the evening
television news dated on Thursday, 4th December
2014 on channel 1 TVNZ was provided
an information, that food for children produced in New
Zealand contains 800 times more residues of pesticides
than similar children food from Europe, and also the
information, that for the last time the NZ government
checked the state of these residues in the year 2009.
Part #E:
Destructive chemicals spoiling our food:
#E1.
Kinds of chemicals (different from pesticides) contained in our foods:
Pesticides already described in item #D1
above are NOT the only dangerous chemicals
that contaminate our food. To other dangerous
chemicals, most frequently contaminating
our food, belong amongst others:
(1) various components and impurities contained in chemical fertilisers,
(2) preservatives and chemicals that supposed
to conserve food (e.g. in order to keep the freshness
of fishes for long periods of time, in some countries
to fishes is injected "formalin" ("formaldehyde") - means
the same dangerous chemical which conserves samples
of dead organisms and bodies),
(3) artificial colourings,
(4) artificial sweeteners,
(5) taste enhancers,
(6) chemicals which are "leaking" from food packages,
(7) components of toothpaste residues of which we
repetitively swallow after every washing our teeth but
which have this tendency to chock our kidneys,
and many other chemicals which cumulative effect
causes various illnesses and gradually kills our
vital organs.
In order to realize how significant is the risk of
introducing these chemicals to our food chain,
let us look here in a more detailed manner at
one of them, namely at the
poisonous element "cadmium" (Cd) spread in large quantities on crop-fields
along with fertilizers - especially with super-phosphates.
Cadmium is a deadly element (heavy metal) that
after the consumption accumulates in bodies of
humans and animals, whereupon, among others,
destroys the kidneys, liver, lungs, induces cancer,
etc. As the chemical element, once you get it into
the soil, there is no way to degrade it, and it waits
until someone, or something, consumes it. Meanwhile,
in nature it occurs typically with layers of minerals
which are used for the production of fertilizers,
especially from the phosphate group. As a result,
each sawing of fertilizer increases in soils of fields
and meadows the concentration of cadmium. For
example, in April 2013 there was available in New Zealand
quite an alarming web page
(I hope that by today it is NOT removed by a
government agency), which author has calculated,
that in this small state sized like Poland, for the last
70 years, only with super-phosphate was annually
sown on the fields and meadows of New Zealand,
about 30 to 40 tons of cadmium. Similar situation
is probably also in other countries. More interestingly,
the New Zealand government does practically
almost nothing to effectively stop this poisoning
of the soil. There is also NO information to the
public about the seriousness of this problem.
Therefore, should NOT be the brave television
program called "Campbell Live" broadcast on
Thursday 11 April 2013, from 19:00 to 19:30,
on channel 3 of Television New Zealand, in
New Zealand about this poisoning of soil by
cadmium ordinary New Zealanders probably
would not have the way to find out. However,
if the soil is once polluted with cadmium over
a certain level, then the food produced in New
Zealand is no longer fit for the human consumption.
After all, it gradually and quietly kills those who
eat it. So no-one should be therefore surprised,
that in New Zealand newspapers increasingly
often appear recently such articles as [1#E1]
entitled "Porirua gets new dialysis unit as kidney
failure on rise", from page A6 of newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Tuesday, April 16, 2013. This
article states, that in the last two years the
number of patients requiring dialysis increased
by about 14%, half of which are diabetes. This
of course induces the question whether the other
half of people with kidney failures are NOT by any
chance victims of these numerous poisons that are
so abundantly poured-out into the fields and meadows
of New Zealand with the tacit support of the authorities?
What's even worse regarding cadmium, is that being
a chemical element, it is impossible to have it removed
from the soil. So when the fields and meadows once
have been poisoned with cadmium, they will remain
toxic for centuries. The situation in New Zealand has
become so serious, that - according to the abovementioned
television program, the authorities of some countries
have begun to block selected New Zealand imports of
agricultural products. This is because these products
have too-much cadmium. In New Zealand itself, the
government has also quietly issued the law, that the
kidneys and other internal organs from animals older
than 2 years are NOT allowed to sell for the human
consumption, because they contain dangerous levels
of this toxic cadmium (hence from these animal
organs are only produced foods for cats and dogs).
#E2.
Insertion of unnatural ingredients into foods:
According to the
philosophy of totalizm
in our physical world nothing has exclusively
good, or exclusively bad, impact or consequences.
After all, everything that surrounds us causes
both, good as well as bad consequences.
Therefore the skill of healthy eating and living
depends on such behaviour, that makes use
of these good consequences, but avoids bad
consequences. In turn the key to such a healthy
eating is to eat mainly what is natural, fresh,
and deprived artificial additions, and also that
is continually changed so that we avoid a
monotonic eating of the same components
and chemicals for long periods of time). Of
course, many uneducated people (in this
many politicians) are NOT aware of the above
truth (and principle of God's action), which
consequent action in a real life was proven only by the
philosophy of totalizm.
Therefore every now and again politicians
cunningly agitated by the to-date "atheistic
orthodox science" (i.e. agitated by this old
"monopolistic" and "atheistic" science which is
described more comprehensively in item #A2.6
of the web page named
totalizm.htm
and in item #C1 of the web page named
telekinetics.htm)
generate various immoral "laws" and "requirements"
to permanently introduce into food increasingly
more new and destructive in long-term components.
And so, the most frequently such components
are added to drinking water. One amongst most
commonly known out of such components forcibly
added to our drinking water is "fluoride" imposed
on us supposedly in order to increase the dental
hygiene of people - for more details see e.g. the
article entitled "Fluoride inquiry part of labour's
health plans" from page A6 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Thursday, November 10, 2011.
Relatively frequent to water is added "iodine".
In turn in Poland during the "Solidarity" unrests
persistent rumours were spreading that the
government is adding "bromine" in order to
"calm down" the excited population. Another
frequent "target" of this kind of governmental
"laws" and "requirements" is bread. For example,
"vitamins" are one amongst ingredients most
frequently added forcibly e.g. to all kinds of
bread produced in some countries - e.g. see
the article "Review too late to stop forced use
of folic acid" from page A2 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Monday, July 13, 2009), or
the article "Experts play down bread concern"
from page A3 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald
(issue dated on Tuesday, July 14, 2009) - both
of which articles discuss the matter of a request
from the government of New Zealand that all kinds
of bread were to forcibly fortified with folic acid.
The argument used during the introduction of laws
which force onto people the long-term swallowing
such components is that they supposedly
help for some illnesses. But those people who
introduce such laws have NO clue what are
true consequences of a long-term (cumulative)
consumption of these components. On the other
hand I am ready to bet, that similarly as long-term
swallowing tooth-past can staff kidneys in some
people, while long-term smoking of cigarettes can
finish with a lung cancer, also a long-term forcing
by politicians to swallow such components forcibly
added to whatever we eat, one day also may
turn out to be a reason for many deaths and
illnesses. Besides, even today in the world
grows a number of opponents who try to
stop further forcing people to eat such
politically introduced components of food.
Part #F:
How immoral decision-makers poison us with radioactivity
which they irresponsibly and sloppily pass to our foods:
#F1.
Sources of deadly radioactivity which gradually accumulate in our food chain and then in our bodies:
Motto:
"Wherever secrets are kept, there also exist some immoral feats and dirty tricks
committed against people, which in first place induced the need for this secrecy."
On Tuesday, 13th September 2011, the shocked
world rapidly learned about a "French manner"
of getting rid of radioactive waste from atomic
power plants. Namely, it turned out that France
secretly burn its radioactive waste in huge furnaces
similar to crematoriums from Hitler's Concentration
Camps. This in turn means, that the smoke that
carries away these radioactive products, after
it ascends into the air, gradually falls down on
paddocks, fields, gardens and forests not only
France itself, but also all nearby European
countries, for example Germany, Switzerland,
Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, England, Belgium,
and probably many other located even further.
(As this is nicely expressed by an old Polish
saying, "in nature nothing disappears,
but only keeps changing its owners".)
Because in France there is a lot of this kind
of nuclear waste (after all, around 70% of the
entire energy generated in France originates
from atomic power plants), it should NOT
surprise anyone, that after it falls down on
paddocks, fields, gardens and forests of Europe,
this radioactivity gradually finds its way to the human
food chain. As the result, ever increasing proportion of
it is consumed by people together with food which
this French smoke sprays, or with meat and milk
of animals which ate it after it falls down to the
ground. No wonder that later in these countries
appear unknown previously, murderous strains
of bacteria and viruses, of the kind of the killer
"E.coli" which raged in Germany in May 2011 and which is
described in (xv) from item #B1 of the web page named
plague.htm,
or these strange cases of "mad cow disease" that "jumped
species" and started to be transmittable to humans.
Of course, this habit of "letting with smoke" of
radioactive waste is kept in a deep secret and
probably the world would NOT learn about it,
if NOT an "accident" in one amongst such
French furnaces for burning radioactive waste
that took place on that Tuesday, 13th September
2011. (That accident killed one person and wounded
further four people.) Only due to this "accident"
the surprised world learned on that day from
television news that such a burning of
radioactive waste is taking place in France.
Later this burning was also described in
some newspaper articles (although carefully,
laconically, and diplomatically - after all
France is known from acts such as the
"Rainbow Warrior bombing") - e.g. see the article
[1#F1] entitled "French play down blast
at nuclear waste plant" from page A14 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Wednesday, September 14, 2011.
That "accident" in French furnace for radioactive
waste rapidly explained the phenomenon which
for a long time puzzled people who watch situation
with radioactivity. The point is, that in recent
times we can notice in Europe the continuous
rise in levels of radioactivity of soil, vegetation
and animals, but until that French "accident"
no-one seem to know where these radioactive
fallouts come from. After all, before that
French "accident", the only commonly known
source of European radioactivity was the
catastrophe in Chernobyl. But because of the
time distance of that explosion in Chernobyl
of 1986, with the elapse of time the radioactivity
caused by Chernobyl should diminish, not
increase. However, in Europe happens an
exact opposite - as this is emphasized for
example by facts described in the article
[2#F1] "Radioactive boars on the
rise in Germany", from page 14 of Malaysian newspaper
The Malay Mail,
issue dated on Friday, 20 August 2010. That article
[2#F1] informs that a growing number of wild pigs from
German forests display already so high radioactivity,
that their meat become dangerous for consumption.
For example, it writes that only in 2009 the government
of Germany was forced to pay 425 000 Euro as
compensations for meat that needed to be destroyed
because of too dangerous level of radioactive contamination.
On the other hand, for comparison, only 10 years earlier
(although already 13 years after the explosion in
Chernobyl), i.e. in 1999, the amount paid for the
same compensations for radioactive meat was
25 000 Euro - this allows to roughly estimate that
during just those 10 years the level of radioactivity
in forests of Germany increased around 17 times.
(Probably forests of Germany lie directly on the
path of prevailing winds that blow from France.)
By the way, it is interesting whether other than
Germany countries, e.g. France itself, also check
their meat for the level of radioactivity, or just
uncritically sell this meat to their own citizens
for eating together with radioactivity contained
in it.
Of course, some secretive and immoral institutions
(and people) that service nuclear power plants,
probably secretly pollute our food, water and
air with radioactivity on a whole number of various
ways, about which we still do NOT know anything -
because these ways were NOT revealed yet to
the public scrutiny due to some "accidents".
Not without reasons practically all institutions
that deal with atomic energy are the most secretive
institutions on the Earth - as an example see the
article [2#M1] from item #M1 of the web page named
telekinetics.htm.
This French sneaky "letting with smoke" radioactive
pollutions is probably just only one amongst numerous
manners on which atomic energy plants and nuclear
reactors can secretly poison our food with radioactivity
(and on which perhaps they actually poison this
food secretly - NOT without reasons they display
a complete lack of transparency and almost everything
about themselves they keep in deep secrecy). Other
such manners may include, for example, polluting
secretly our environment via the water used for
cooling-down nuclear reactors, polluting via almost
invisible vapours and emissions that quietly raise
from these reactors, polluting via radioactive waste
secretly dumped by some countries into seas and
oceans, etc., etc. We must remember that for
radioactivity is also valid the "law of balance" -
this means that "the radioactivity produced must
be equal to the radioactivity which lands in our
natural environment". And we must also
remember that atomic power plants and nuclear
reactors produce massive amounts of radioactive
waste, which later secretive institutions that service
these power plants and reactors must somehow
get rid off secretly and in hiding from people.
In order to diminish, radioactivity requires
hundreds, and sometimes even thousands,
of years. Thus, sufficiently dangerous for
the humanity was already the radioactivity
remaining from former tests of nuclear weapons.
(By the way, a favourite site for these tests of
nuclear weapons were small islands on the
Pacific Ocean located not far from New Zealand,
e.g. the French New Caledonia - this was the main
reason why New Zealanders are deeply disgusted
by nuclear energy and why New Zealand still
maintains the noble status of a "nuclear-free zone".)
Unfortunately, because of some suicidal trend,
the humanity as a whole has NOT stopped on
waste from those murderous nuclear weapons, and
still secretly escalates the density of radioactive
polluting of our planet through the so-called "peaceful
use of atomic energy" and through immoral and
dirty activities of various secretive institutions
which produce this atomic energy. In the result,
to the greatest sources of radioactivity still
accumulating in our food, water and air (and
in final count - in our bodies) belong at present
the "peaceful" reactors and atomic power plants.
This is because these reactors and power plants
produce massive amounts of radioactive waste,
which in the final count always land in the nature -
while later in our bodies. In addition, immoral,
slack, dangerous, and irresponsible exploitation
of these reactors and power plants, leads relatively
frequent to uncontrolled explosions, such as
previously was Chernobyl in Ukraine in 1986,
while recently was four times bigger than Chernobyl
the explosion in Fukushima, Japan, of 2011.
More information on the topic of these nuclear
explosions, and about escalating pollution of our
natural environment with their radioactive products, is
provided in items #M1 to #M1.3 of the web page named
telekinetics.htm,
in items #C7 and #I1 of the web page named
seismograph.htm,
or in item #F3 from the web page named
god_exists.htm.
Radioactivity is a ruthless killer, while
someone's active, or passive, participation in
the proliferation of it on the Earth (and thus
someone's indirect contribution to killing of
other people with radioactivity) is one amongst
most immoral human behaviours which can
be classified to the same punishable by
God
category as e.g. earning money through a
production of cigarettes or a distribution of narcotics.
Thus, in the light of continually growing amount
of radioactivity which we are consuming lately,
NO-ONE should be surprised by the escalation
of numbers of various illnesses that are related
to radioactivity, e.g. cancers. So it is about the
time that everyone amongst us starts to understand
that the radioactivity in our food is deadly, while
these people who fall victims of it cannot count
on a normal length of life. As well, there is about
the time to understand that the only truly safe
atomic power plants and nuclear reactors are
these ones which never were build, or which
never were made operational. It is also worth
to remember about the principle of God's action
described in items #B4 and #B1 of the web page named
parasitism.htm -
and stating that every
person which is passive towards immorality
committed with the knowledge of that person, is
punished by God equally severely as if he or she was a
co-culprit in committing that immorality.
After all, this principle causes that people who
know about immoral spread of radioactivity over
the Earth, but do nothing to actively try to stop
this spreading, will be later treated by God as if
they were partners in that spreading - e.g. they
will die in young age for some illness induced
by radioactivity, or they will receive a descendant
who is deformed (or affected in any other way)
by that radioactivity.
#F2.
How the radioactivity from our food, water and air secretly kill us through inducing our illnesses:
Motto:
"The support of passiveness towards the 'atomic energy' that turns our planet into a radioactive
dump, in fact equals to acceleration of our own deaths and imposing birth defects at our descendants."
If one analyses how the present "official
orthodox medicine" describes reasons for
people's deaths, then it turns out that it provides
only the "resultant causes" (for example, that
someone died of cancer, asthma, failure of
kidneys, etc.). But almost never this official medicine
seeks and lets public know from what these
"resultant causes" originate - means it does
NOT seek the "primary causes". In other words,
almost never it seeks and reveals publicly,
whether the cancer on which someone died
results from the fact that this someone swallowed
too much of food polluted with radioactive
isotopes, whether asthma that killed someone
is the outcome of him or her breathing deadly
isotopes or pollutants, whether the failure of kidneys,
results from the fact that he or she staffed the
body with pesticides or some dangerous isotopes
and chemicals contained in the food that he or she
ate and in water that he or she drank, etc., etc.
As an outcome, various blind to truth "atheistic
orthodox scientists" can lie arrogantly in our eyes,
claiming that e.g. in the result of Chernobyl nuclear
explosion only 60 people have died - for details
see 3 in item #F3 from the web page named
god_exists.htm.
However, there exist various premises to suspect,
that if such research of "primary causes" of deaths
of individual people were carried out on the Earth,
then rapidly the humanity would experience a shock.
After all, then probably the biggest killer of people
would turn out to be the so-called "peaceful use of
atomic energy", or more strictly the radioactivity
which people eat, during, and breathe, because on
various ways it leaks from atomic power plants and
nuclear reactors to our food, water, and air. After
all, the radioactivity is already well-known to us as
a ruthless cause of various murderous illnesses,
e.g. cancer, which kill a significant proportion of
people. We know also that it causes various genetic
mutations, degenerations, and birth defects in people -
which also in the final count lead to deaths of the victims.
Radioactivity is also a cause for mutations of various
algae, organisms and creatures which poison and make
unhealthy our food, and which make difficult our lives.
(Interesting, whether the epidemics of ticks which
after 2004 started to endanger Polish forests, was
caused e.g. by radioactivity blown from France as
far as Poland? Similarly, whether the epidemics
of poisonous sea slugs on New Zealand beaches -
described in item #K1.6 of the web page named
newzealand.htm,
was also caused by radioactivity?)
Radioactivity is also a cause of mass
mutations of various murderous viruses and bacteria
which are sources of unknown earlier and increasingly
more dangerous illnesses, and because of which
numerous people and animals must die. Only from
the content of item #B1 of the web page named
plague.htm
we can see that the number of such unknown earlier
deadly illnesses recently grows rapidly. We should
also bear in mind that radioactivity may introduce
disturbances to correct functioning of the human
"program of life and fate" described, amongst
others, on the web page named
immortality.htm.
In turn disturbances in work of this program may cause
uncontrolled shifting of some people to completely
different times. If such a shifting occurs to times
in which these people are still alive, then they may
unexpectedly appear in places and times which they
do NOT remember, or in which they are NOT
remembered by anyone - as this was the case
with that English boy which mysteriously appeared
in Berlin on 6th September 2011 after two week-long
march towards north through empty forests (for more
details about this mysterious boy see the article
[1#F2] entitled "Mystery boy emerges
after years in woods", from page A12 of newspaper
The New Zealand Herald,
issue dated on Monday, September 19, 2011). In turn,
if such a shifting through time happens to years that are
beyond the life-span of these people, then they rapidly
disappear without a trace and never anyone hears about
them again.
#F3.
Only people who are immoral and completely deprived rational
thinking still refuse to notice that the atomic energy is the most
expensive, most dangerous, and most dirty energy on the Earth:
Motto:
"The monopole for knowledge of the 'atheistic orthodox science' and its notorious
avoidance of unwanted truths, leads to the situation that the most needed investment
of individual people becomes a Geiger counter, while
the most safety-oriented activity becomes checking for radiation of everything that
people put into mouths."
Today almost everyone falls for screaming
advertisements that the most vital household
device is a "computer". However, in reality
the most needed household device in present
times turns out to be a "Geiger counter"
(Geiger meter) for measuring the level
of harmful radioactivity. After all, for
reasons described in item #C2 of this
web page, these people who are paid for
safeguarding the proliferation of radioactivity
over the Earth, means so-called "atheistic
orthodox scientists", panicky are afraid of
revealing truth to us about a real level of
radioactivity. On the other hand, experience
of these people, who already purchased
and widely use Geiger counters, e.g.
inhabitants of present Japan, rapidly
revealed shocking facts. For example, it
turns out that radioactivity is already present
in milk of mothers - as this describes the
article [7#M1.1] from item #M1.1 of the web page named
telekinetics.htm.
Or it turns out that in shops is sold beef in
which the content of radioactive caesium exceeds
6.5 times the legally permitted level (which
probably is already too-high and unhealthy -
only that no-one has the courage to verify
this) - for details see the article [8#M1.1]
from item #M1.1 of the abovementioned web page named
telekinetics.htm.
Let us do not forged here about the fact
described in the article [2#F1] from item
#F1 of this web page, namely that meat
from a significant proportion of wild pigs
in Germany is already so saturated with
radioactivity, that it is too dangerous for
consumption and must be destroyed. So if
Geiger counters
become today equally commonly used as
computers are, then we would rapidly learned
truths that would "raise hair on our heads".
Highly paid experts from "atomic energy" tell the
rest of us that atomic energy has many advantages -
e.g. is "inexpensive". However, they do NOT
count to "costs" of that energy the price (nor
payments of the yearly "rent") for these already huge
areas of the highly expensive land, which the
atomic energy already turned into a "radioactive
wasteland" and excluded from the human
use for nearest several hundred, or
perhaps even several thousands, of years.
They also do NOT count the value of these
people whom the atomic energy took life,
nor costs of hospitals and medicines for
healing these defects and human illnesses
which were caused by radioactivity.
Those experts tell us also that "atomic energy"
is "safe". But they do NOT take under consideration
this escalation of human deaths, nor these illnesses
and birth defects, which were caused by radioactive
waste left from this supposedly "safe" atomic energy.
Experts from the atomic energy describe to us
an "ideal" situation, which would exist only in the
world of absolutely perfect people - i.e. people
who do NOT act immorally nor commit errors
and mistakes. But in reality we live in highly
imperfect and very immoral world. So if only
in this imperfect world something is covered
with secrets and protected by laws, so that
no-one from outside can "look at hands" of
the people involved, then some their decision
makers begin to act in there in a highly immoral
manner, e.g. "letting with the smoke radioactive
waste" - so that this waste poisons or even kills
people around. Furthermore, many people display
slackness, complacency, and the lack of
responsibility in matters of safety. In the
result, radioactive waste and products of
atomic accidents that escape due to slackness,
or that are spread due to accidents, gradually
turn our planet into a radioactive rubbish dump.
Thus, the only manner to stop that process
of hidden poisoning people with radioactivity,
is to begin decisive actions to completely block
the further use of atomic energy on the Earth.
After all, this dirty energy is NOT the only source
of energy capable to replace the to-date burning
of fossil fuels.
#F4.
If some politicians and decision makers behaved slightly more moral,
then our planet would NOT need to be turned into a radioactive rubbish dump:
At this point it is worth to add, that the use
of atomic energy, and thus also production
of radioactivity, could be eliminated completely
from the Earth. The
philosophy of totalizm
explains even to us how to carry our this
elimination most easily (or more strictly
it provides us with recipes for the so-called
free energy -
which sources are able to replace in future
the highly destructive nuclear energy).
Unfortunately, many immoral politicians
and complacent in their "ivory towers"
atheistic orthodox scientists insist on
escalation of these sources of radioactivity
in order to satisfy various their personal
ambitions. Simultaneously the "atheistic
orthodox science" - still holding tightly
its "monopole for knowledge", stubbornly
refuses to undertake research on completely
new eco-sources of "pollution free" energy -
of the kind like these suggested by totalizm
generators of free energy.
The entire item #I1 from the separate web page named
seismograph.htm
is even devoted to a presentation of the most
shocking examples of such already notorious
refusal of research on alternative sources of
energy by decision makers which represent
the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date.
#F5.
The burning single drops of radioactive rain in New Zealand after the Fukushima disaster -
means how I discovered that radioactive waste is NOT spread across the globe
diluted evenly in the volume of rain, but forms single "hot" drops densely packed
with radioactivity which mutate and probably also cause the skin cancer
(melanoma):
Motto: "if you are in New Zealand (or probably
also in any other place on Earth) and it is just beginning to rain, then
run as fast as you can, to hide under a roof, because if on you is to
fall a described here burning radioactivity raindrop, then in spite of
what the scientists and politicians claim, probably later are to emerge
from this raindrop various health consequences that are to be rather
unpleasant for you and for your descendants!"
This item has quite an interesting history, from
the disclosure of which I decided to start writing it.
Well, some time after in February 2012 I purchased
our tiny flat with a garden in the New Zealand township of
Petone,
my attention was drawn to a bird called the "blackbird",
which in late 2012 was born somewhere in the vicinity
of the flat, and later together with its whole family regularly
fed on earthworms caught in my garden. This is because
the "blackbird" was a mutant, in which among
perfectly black feathers there were patches of white
feathers. A photograph of that mutated blackbird is
shown on "Fig. #T1cd" from the web page named
solar.htm.
Before the nuclear explosion in Fukushima, Japan,
means before the date of 11th March 2011 (for details
refer to the description of this explosion provided in
items #M1 to #M1.3 from the web page named
telekinetics.htm)
I have never and nowhere in New Zealand seen such
mutated blackbirds - while as a highly perceptive
scientist professionally trained in noticing all possible
anomalies (and, in addition, make also especially
sensitive due to the carrying out of my "hobby"
research), if such mutants previously existed in
New Zealand, then for sure I would note them.
However, soon after the nuclear explosion in Fukushima,
i.e. starting since 2012, these mutants quickly
began to appear in the area where I live.
The obvious conclusion which is induced by the
existence of these New Zealand mutations, is that
these mutations of "black blackbirds" (and also
probably mutations of many other creatures and
people naturally NOT covered with black feathers,
and thus typically unnoticeable to others) most
likely have been caused by radioactive fallouts
that winds brought from Fukushima in Japan as
far as New Zealand - which lies at the edge of
the world. Unfortunately, for a long time I did not
have a device for measuring radioactivity. So I do
NOT had a way to see what was going on with
the radioactivity in New Zealand. But then just
after I was able to photograph examples of such
mutated blackbirds, and thus as soon as in item
#T7 from the web page named
solar.htm
I was able to reveal (and document) to my readers
the existence of these mutations blackbirds, I decided
to buy such a radioactivity measuring device for myself.
Unfortunately, to my large frustration soon discovered
that (like many different products readily available in
other countries, but chronically lacking in stores of NZ -
e.g. like solar panels or steel mesh for antimosquito use)
in the stores of New Zealand one also cannot purchase
a measuring instrument for radioactivity. So I expressed
my frustration on this issue and in item #T7 from the
abovementioned my web page named
solar.htm
I complained to my readers about this lack of measuring
radioactivity instruments in New Zealand stores. In response
to this my complaining, one amongst the readers (who is
cooperating with me for many years) wrote to me an email
that he has the radioactivity monitor which served him well
for measuring his environment and food, and because he
no longer need it, he can send it to me as a Christmas gift.
Of course, I immediately said YES and the needed
radiation monitor produced by the Russian company "Radex", type RD1706
arrived to me already on 19th November 2015 - see its
English-language manual that is available in PDF at the address
www.quarta-rad.ru/en/manuals/RD1706.pdf.
After receiving the radiation monitor I immediately
started checking as to how looks-like radioactivity in
Petone
and around this township. Unfortunately, in the first
phase of my measurements everything looked allegedly
as safe and normal. A typical present scientist could
therefore hail that the Fukushima disaster changed
nothing in New Zealand - as for many recent years
a number of "scientific authorities" misled the humanity
(without further incurring for it any consequences)
that supposedly the warming of Earth climate is an
illusion and actually does NOT exist. I mean, in Petone,
nor in its vicinity, I could NOT detect any "hot spots"
of dangerous radiation levels - although the elevated
background radiation on geological faults allowed me
to discover how these faults actually run in our area.
(It turned out that the most active geological faults run
exactly under supermarkets in which we shop and under
the church in masses of which we participate every
Saturday). When I discussed this "normality" of my
measurements with the donor of the instrument
discussed here, he mentioned the possibility that
radioactivity probably once fell with the rain, among
others, at eggs, or at young blackbirds - thus causing
mutations of these blackbirds, after which fall, however,
it sank to the ground and now there is no trace of it
So I decided to check if there is any evidence of such
a course of events. In Petone many outlets from street
waste water is discharged directly into the sea. These
outlets are located on the Petone beach, and some of
their outlets are easily accessible. So I have made measurements
of the background radiation at one of these outlets,
which almost always is accessible. It turned out that
beside it and along the groove, wherein the waste water
flow down across the beach to the sea, the background
radiation is systematically about 50% higher than the
background radiation in surrounding of the effluence from the
beach. This in turn allows to logically deduce that really
through this effluent periodically runs off some radioactive
waste that then has been soaked into the beach sand and
still cause a local increase of background radioactivity by
these about 50%. In this way I established the first premises
and evidence, which seem to confirm that
mutations of New Zealand blackbirds
actually are caused by droplets of radioactive waste which fall
onto New Zealand along with the rain, and thus which also
occasionally fall on bird eggs or bird chicks.
As a result of that finding, I started a more precise
search for damages which could be causes by droplets
of radioactive rain. Soon I recalled these local "burns"
on leaves of plants from my garden - see "Fig. #F1".
I saw these burns on my garden since a long time, but
I have always considered them to be some form of leaf
diseases. After all, the New Zealand vegetation is attacked
by an entire range of pathogenic factors, for example by
fungi, mold, yeast, viruses, bacteria, insects, and even
by so-called "mites". (With the English name of
"mites",
while with the Polish name of
"roztocza",
is described a kind of miniature parasitic, sucking insects-like creatures
so small, that typically they remain invisible to the naked eye,
i.e. with a length less than one-tenth of a millimetre. These
miniature insects parasite on humans, animals, other insects
and plants. Over plants they are typically dispersed by flies
or by other insects, often forming on leaves large colonies
which either eat the leaf tissue, causing on them just like a
"burning", or their droppings induce formation on leaves of
accretions in English called
"leaf galls".
As I remember from years of my youth, in Poland and in
Europe "mites" is not a big problem, because winter frosts
debilitating them maintain their multiplying at a low level.
However, the mild maritime climate of New Zealand cause
that mites can proliferate indefinitely. Therefore, in NZ they
constitute a real plague.) The discussed here "burnings" I
did NOT detect in my garden too often. After all, it is difficult
to spot them and they appear on a completely random leaves.
Thus, I typically discover new ones at a rate of no more than
once a month. Always, as soon as I detect one of them, I
try to destroy it "just in case" - because if they are caused
by a disease, then their destruction would prevent it from
spreading to the rest of the plants from my garden. Unfortunately,
when the radiation monitor reached me, for some time none
of these burnings reminded me of their existence. Only after
the rain that fell a couple of nights before 30th November 2015,
I noticed a new double droplet-shaped burning which appeared
on the leaf of a small grape what I am trying to grow. Because
this grape still is very young and has only a few leaves, while
this "burning" was the third consecutive which appeared on
the grape since the NZ spring of 2015 and which urged me
to cut off already the third of its few leaves, a few days I do
NOT cut the leaf, because I believed that its removal and
destruction probably is to hurt more that grape than its leaving.
However, then I noted that exactly above this double droplet-like
burning on a leaf, there is also a small droplet-like burning
at the tip of the stem of that young grape - which burning
killed the tip of that stem. So I cut off that leaf and I put it
under my radiation monitor. Monitor indications quickly
jumped by more than 50% higher than the value of the
background radiation. It means that the leaf turned out to
be slightly radioactive, although its location on grape was
such that the radioactive droplet of rain which caused the
burning, slipped off or bounced from the leaf, after which
it sank to the ground. On a leaf remained only a trace
radioactivity from that carried out by that droplet. The same
droplet during its fall also hit into the stem of grape and
also burned that stem. To document that finding, at the
area of my garden in which the background radiation was
the lowest, I made photographs shown below as "Fig. #F1",
which document that leaf which was burned by a radioactive
droplet of rain, and also document the indications of radioactivity
monitor after placing it on that leaf, and without that leaf (i.e.
when it only measured the background radiation).
The above my findings turn out to represent another
very important my discovery, which introduces for us
many important consequences. For example, one of
the consequences of this discovery is the information
that is already presented in the title and the motto of
this item, and which straightens the error highly dangerous
for humans that is embedded into the current views
on radioactive waste and fallouts. Namely, this discovery
reveals that radioactive waste and fallouts dispersed
throughout the world by the winds, do NOT behave
in a manner on which probably count those scientists
and politicians who are responsible for the disposal
of these deadly substances in a "secret" and the least
"embarrassing" way. The point is that after getting into
the atmosphere waste and fallouts do NOT dilute in the
entire volume of rain with which then they fall to Earth,
but rather the radioactive
waste forms in the rain distinct "burning" droplets, in
which radioactivity has enough high enough concentration,
that after the fall on the plants, animals, birds, or people,
this radioactivity causes burnouts, induces mutations
(of e.g. NZ blackbirds), and probably also causes
cancers. The consequence of this feature
of radioactive waste is that now every rain
turns out to be dangerous to health and to life, because
apparently every rain contains single droplets of highly
concentrated radioactivity - hence from every rain now
we should quickly hide under a roof. An example
of other consequence of the described here my discovery
of the existence of such deadly raindrops, is the awareness
that such burning, mutating, and probably also inducing
cancer droplets containing in themselves the concentrated
radioactivity, probably also help to serve the universal
justice in the manner and in compliance with the rules,
which I tried to explain to readers in item #N2 from my web page named
pajak_re_2017.htm.
However, in my opinion, there is also another even
more important consequence of my discovery described
here that in present times with normal rains, which typically
are harmless to humans, are also falling single droplets of
highly concentrated radioactive waste that probably are
deadly to humans, to fauna and to flora. Namely, the most
vital consequence of this discovery is the already looking
to be closer to the truth than the previous one, the explanation
of the to-date strange mysteries associated with the skin cancer called
"melanoma".
(Notice that to-date the melanoma has been explained by
the official medicine and science as the skin cancer caused
solely by excess of UV radiation produced by the sun itself.)
For example, the explanation of the riddle (1) why
melanoma firstly appears on the skin of people in a form
of "freckles" with the raindrop-like shape almost identical
to the shape of the burning on the leaf shown here in
"Fig. #F1a". Or the explanation of the riddle (2)
why before the world powers started the test explosions
of nuclear weapons, melanoma did NOT exist on Earth,
and also the puzzle (3) why most severe cases
of melanoma occur in Australia and in New Zealand -
means in the countries closest to experimental areas
from the South Pacific, on which were blasted the majority
of test explosions of atomic bombs. Or the explanation
of the riddle (4) why after a nuclear explosion
in Fukushima (Japan), in countries such as New Zealand,
Australia, and several others, in the sky over which winds
blow (including the strong "jet stream") directly from
Japan, recently is observed an intensification of
melanoma
"epidemic", in spite of the puzzle (5) that scientists
say that for some time now supposedly the "ozone hole"
(which had previously been held responsible for increased
UV radiation, and thus for causing melanoma) is disappearing,
and also in spite of the puzzle (6) that the beauty
industry lately supplies the population with increasingly
more efficient tanning creams, which are blocking UV
radiation thus supposed to prevent "melanoma", while
simultaneously (7) people wear increasingly
more of these creams before exposing their skin to sunlight
and to UV radiation, and thus the number of melanoma
cases should drop down. The solution for all these puzzles
stems from the simple fact, that so-far the official medicine
did NOT even consider the fact that there may be some
other reason for the occurrence of melanoma than
solely excessive UV radiation which tanning people
take. After all, the
existence of occasionally falling with the rain, the
individual droplets of highly concentrated radioactive
waste described here, suggests that perhaps the real
cause of melanoma may be the collapse of these
radioactive droplets on human skin.
In turn just the exposure of the skin to UV radiation
perhaps may only make the skin a little more susceptible
to initiation of the melanoma by these radioactive droplets,
while those strange puzzles of melanoma listed above
suggest that, in itself, probably UV radiation is not yet
a reason for the melanoma development. The point is
that to UV the humanity is exposed since the moment
of creation, that is for around 6000 years, while melanoma
appeared on Earth only with the first explosions of atomic
bombs and together with waste from nuclear reactors.
In addition, as it is explained in item #A1 of this web page,
everything that God created was "very good" - i.e. before
people have spoiled of what God has created, both human
skin and UV radiation coexisted and cooperated with each
other, and NOT mutually destroyed each other.
But as a scientist, I have a duty to inform you that
from a scientific point of view, my findings described
here will probably arouse a lot of reservations. After
all, I am NOT an expert on radiation, so what am
describing here I determined and documented only
as "amateur" and "hobbyist" - relying solely on the
power of my logic and deduction. In addition, all
this is based on a single measurement. For only
a single measurement I was able to carry out so-far,
since the evidence of the existence of the discussed
here individual raindrops containing highly concentrated
radioactive waste must be actively "hunt" - because
they turn out to be as illusory (elusive) as
illusory are, for example,
UFO vehicles
or
proofs for the existence of God
(which, after all, for many centuries are deceiving with
their intelligence and elusiveness the routinely acting
professional scientists). Meanwhile, the Bible commands
that each matter must be based on at least two or three
independent witnesses or confirmations (see item #C5
from the web page named
bible.htm).
Thus, "if" or "when" I could make a similar subsequent
measurement, this so-far remains unknown. After all, it
will depend highly accidental fall of further burning raindrops
on any of leaves in my garden, which leaves in addition
I must then see, take notice, identify, measure and document -
before they by themselves fall off or are destroyed.
Unfortunately noticing, identifying, examining and
documenting these droplets is NOT going to be so
sure and easy. After all, already now I am aware,
that moral mechanisms act in such a way, that the
discovery, confirmation and dissemination of any
truth requires overcoming the whole ocean of short-term
obstacles and adversities, which the so-called "moral
field" always puts in the way of people seeking the truth -
as more widely it is explained in item #C4.2 and #C4.7
from the web page named
morals.htm.
Therefore, it is known in advance that the confirmation
and dissemination of the truth about the herein described
individual droplets of concentrated radioactivity falling with
rains in short-term will be hindered by this "moral field",
and thus is NOT going to be easy and will require overcoming
a number of difficulties which are emerge only in the future
and the breaking through which typically is NOT possible for
the working alone hobbyist-retiree who investigates the matter
decisive of the health and lives of virtually all of the humanity.
For these reasons I hope that what I am describing here will
inspire also other researchers and readers for whom matters
the learning and the disseminating of truth, to the joining this
research and starting a similar to my "hunting" for those single,
devastating droplets of burning radioactive rain. I also invite
everyone, and appeal to anyone, who knows a bit about radioactivity
and has the required instrumentation, to repeated and to check
my results. After all, from what so far I have established, and
what in the scientific sense is only a preliminary identification
of the general area and the direction in which we should now
take our "hunting" for the truth, seems to indicate fairly obvious
conclusion that the rain which falls on New Zealand (and hence
almost certainly, also the rain which falls today in any every other
country of the world), from time to time single droplets are falling,
which contain a highly concentrated radioactivity capable of
causing, among others, genetic mutations, and most likely
also cancers (e.g. "melanoma").
Unfortunately for us, that radioactivity is highly
elusive. Indeed, after falling to the ground it
quickly soaks into the soil, flows into the sea, or
is dissipated in the environment. So generally
speaking, these typical rutyne measurements
of professional scientists so-far are unable to
detect its destructive power - thus to detect it
and test it, necessary is to carry out a type of
"hunting" specifically oriented at detecting it.
But in spite of its elusiveness, the devastating
effect of these individual drops of radioactivity
is already dangerous to people, flora and fauna -
as have already proved it the mutations of New
Zealand blackbirds, as well as the burnings of
the leaves described here. We should therefore
also consider what most probably will happen
if such a burning drop of concentrated radioactivity
falls, for example, on the belly of a pregnant woman -
while this woman may e.g. be your wife or relative.
In addition, over time the radioactivity will be
accumulated in our environment - as accumulated
up to date was climate warming (whose existence
many professional scientists previously denied).
So, since the destructive power of that burning
radioactivity occasionally contained in individual
droplets of rain, already manifested itself in the
form of New Zealand's blackbirds mutations
described here, therefore, while the official science
and governments will conveniently continue to
be silent in the matter of this mortal danger
occasionally falling on people with rains, I have
here the advice-warning for the reader - which
I summarized also in the motto to that item.
It states: "if you are
in New Zealand (and probably also in any other
place on Earth) and just begins to rain, then run
as fast as you can for cover under a roof, because
if also onto you will fall the described here burning
droplet of rain with concentrated radioactivity, then
in spite of what say scientists and politicians, probably
are to emerge later from this some health problems
very unpleasant for you and for your descendants!"
By some strange coincidence, I already now am also
able to estimate roughly what is the "annual density"
of fallout in New Zealand of the described herein
individual "burning" droplets of radioactive rain.
The possibility of this estimation is given to me by
an unusual history of a tiny grape plant, the leaf
of which I subjected to the checks described here.
About 30 cm long branch of this grape gave me a
neighbour in winter 2014. Earlier this neighbour,
commenting on my efforts of planting grapes (which
previously I used to buy in NZ garden shops) around
all fences of our flat, she told me about the delicious
black grapes that grew by the house of her parents.
At my request, in winter she cut off a twig from the
grape of her parents and gave it to me. Immediately
after receiving the twigs I planted it - initially in the pot
(so that I could move it later in the sunniest place of
my garden). In fact, in the spring of 2014 it began to
grow into a small grape plant. In the summer I replanted
it to the place of permanent growth, where it grown to
a height of about 50 cm. But then in autumn and winter
several times it was attacked by the Australian pest called
"possum",
which nestles somewhere near my garden, and during
nights is chewing everything that grows in my garden, i.e.
twigs, leaves, fruits, etc. These "possums" is a very voracious
night pests that are currently wreaking havoc in the vegetation
of New Zealand - where they have no natural enemies
(besides humans). Their voracity is similar to the famous
and already proverbial
"tasmanian devil"
(several of which have recently also been brought to NZ).
It is just that these "devils" eat meat, while "possums" devour
vegetation. During the winter of 2015 the discussed grape
plant was so devoured by that possum that I was afraid that
it will wither. In the spring, however, it grew one leaf and then
one stem. So in order to save it from further night attacks
of this voracious possum, in the spring of 2015 I bought a
piece of flat, flexible plexiglas of a thickness of around 1 mm,
and surrounded the grape plant with a kind of a transparent
plexiglas tube rolled from that piece and tied together with
a string so that it formed a diameter of around 25 cm and
a height of 70 cm - see photo from "Fig. #F2". This
tube NOT only that protects the grape plant from the voracity
of that possum, but it also makes that to this grape plant the
rain can only fall through the upper opening of the tube with
a surface area of around f=490 square centimeters. The leaves
of this grape plant currently occupy a whole surface of the tube.
Because I especially carefully care for that grape, watering it
and seeing almost every day, during about three months (d=91)
that have passed since the arrival of spring and growth of its
current leaves, I discovered on it (and removed from it) three
leaves (i=3) burned in the manner described here - but the first
two of these leaves were burned when I have not yet had the
radiation monitor. This already now lets me estimate that throughout
the entire year, through the above surface of the opening of
that tube, statistically falls around r=12 droplets of burning
radioactive rain - that is, during a year one such a droplet
statistically falls onto each around u=40 cm square of my
garden area, and most likely, also all over New Zealand.
In other words, the determined by algorithm which I am
presenting below the annual
density of burning droplets of radioactive rain, for New
Zealand amounts approximately to one radioactive droplet
per every u=40 square cm of New Zealand area.
That means, my grape plant has already allowed me to
estimate that for every square of the surface of NZ of the
side dimension of slightly more than 6 cm, falls one discussed
here radioactive burning droplet of rain per each year.
So on each around one and a half square meters of the
surface of NZ - that is, on each surface area that typically
is soaked by every rain on a single person, statistically
speaking every day should fall one such mutating and
carcinogenic radioactive droplet of rain. (Of course, in
practice it does not rain every day. So when we begin
to have rain, actually on that surface area is to fall more
than one radioactive, burning droplet - hence probably
we have today so many of cases of melanoma.) As NZ
lies on the edge of the world, that is away from the majority
of nuclear reactors and also away from the
major nuclear accidents and leaks of radioactivity,
(e.g. away from Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima,
etc.), in other countries of the world probably the density
of falling such burning droplets of radioactive rain is higher -
hence in order the reader "knows what is happening",
I propose that he/she tries to estimate own annual density
of radioactive droplets - as I am to explain it below. Although
of these burning droplets falls too little to cause any significant
changes in the global Earth's radioactivity within the lifetime
of a single person (and thus in order that they can be detected
and hailed as "dangerous" by routinely acting professional
scientists), I think that this is already enough much that in
the future accumulate in the soil so much radioactivity that
it can cause mutation, degeneration, and extinction of the
entire future humanity. After all, some isotopes contained
in the nuclear waste, radioactivity remains destructive sometimes
for many thousands of years. So let us do NOT delay
action until with the radioactivity repeats the same story
as with procrastination of addressing global warming -
especially since through the unstoppably deepening now
the disaster of climate warming, a small group of people
will probably be able to survive (for more details see item
#T1 from the web page named
solar.htm),
but excessive growth of deadly radioactivity certainly will
kill all of the humanity - that is, it will kill all the descendants
of people living today.
***
Because of the seriousness of situation described here,
it would be worth that every conscious reader of this web
page tried to see by himself/herself, how the annual density
"u" of burning droplets of radioactive rain that fall at his/her
place of residence, compares to the estimated above density
of the burning radioactive droplets that fall in New Zealand.
The point is, that the described above my method of such
estimating of that annual density can now be repeated by
virtually almost every reader who has a garden - i.e. even
by the reader who (like once myself) is unable to purchase
in own country any device for measuring radioactivity. After
all, a good indicator of radioactivity turn out to be leaves of
some sensitive plants (e.g. as I have realized this in my garden,
certainly such an indicator are the grape leaves) - i.e. the
leaves that reveal on themselves the discussed in this item
and shown on the photograph from "Fig. #F1a" burning
droplets of radioactive rain. In order to estimate the annual
density of fallout of such burning dropletss of radioactivity
in the place of residence of the reader, using the same
estimation algorithm which I used
in New Zealand and which I am describing here,
the following should be done:
1.
A single, or several, small plants with delicate leaves,
for example young grapes, should be planted in the
garden. (It may be, that this experiment will also work
with any other plants with large soft leaves, e.g. with
peas, tomato, potato, etc.). In order to plant these
seedlings the reader does NOT need to purchase
them in a shop, but near the end of winter (although
still before the time when eg. the grapes begin to
create spring buds) can be eg. planted into the soil
a grape twig of a length between about 30 and 90 cm -
which probably will gladly give to us a helpful neighbour.
This is because grapes grow from planted stems and
branches - exactly the same way as do the willows.
More interestingly, to increase the production of grapes,
each winter grapes should be trimmed by cutting off
some of their branches (thus, by giving to us one such
a branch for a seedling a neighbour will also benefit).
After each such trimming always remain unnecessary
twigs, which can then be used as cuttings for planting.
Initially I advise these cuttings are planted in large
pots, and only after a few months to replant them
in the target sites (plants in pots are easier to care for).
Of course, the experiment described here can also be
performed on plants that are already growing - but
typically these are already large, and thus later there
will be technical difficulty with the surrounding them
with a transparent tube of a known area of the inlet
for rain.
2.
During the summer, select for experiments a plant (e.g.
a grape) which is growing the fastest and formed the
most of leaves. For this purpose the plant should
be surrounded by a transparent tube, so that the rain
which will fall on its leafs will be able to enter only through
the possible to calculate area of the upper inlet of this
tube - as shown in the photograph from "Fig. #F2". The
watering of the plant should then be made by pouring
water at its roots (at the bottom of the tube) - so that the
water do not accidentally broke its leaves or create misleading
marks on its leaves. The diameter of the tube must be
so chosen that the whole of its cross-section was covered
with leafs of the control plant (e.g. grape), means that
raindrops falling into this tube have a maximum chance
of landing on one of these leaves.
3.
Write down a date when the systematic observation
of leaves of this plant were started, and write also dates
or the appearance of each of these droplet-like burnings
on leaves - i.e. of burnings similar to those shown in the
photograph of the leaf from "Fig. #F1a". (Notice that such
burnings of leaves with radioactivity does not disappear
automatically, hence you do NOT have to check your
control plant every day, and this can be done e.g. only
about once a week.) I also advise to cut off each such
burned leaf, and after the measurement of the radiation
and after photographing it - to carefully and safely get
rid of it.
4.
If you have a radiation monitor (meter), then it is worth
to measure and to record how higher than the background
radiation is the radiation emitted from each droplet-like burned
leaf. But if there is NO radiation meter, then you have to accept
(i.e. make the so-called "assumption"), that the amount of that
radiation is certainly a dangerously high - since it caused a
burning of the leaf. If you have a camera or cellphone with
a camera, then it is worth to document photographically every
such burnout.
5.
When in late summer leafs of the controlled plant
already become shabby and insensitive, you should
end the experiment and write down the date of completion.
Then, knowing already how many days "d" you were
conducting this experiment, and knowing how many "i"
of hot droplets of radioactive rain caused burns on leaves
of the control plant, you can from the formula r=365xi/d
(where the symbols "x" and "/" are operators of multiplication
and division) calculate the amount "r" of burning droplets
of radioactive rain falling statistically in a given location during
the entire one year. Then, knowing the area "f" of the inlet
to the transparent tube that surrounded the control plant, from
the formula u=f/r it can also be calculated what is
the annual density "u" of fallout of burning droplets of
radioactive rain in our place of residence. I would be
grateful for sending me thus obtained resulting "u", "f" and
"r", along with a brief description of your control plant that
was used, and with any other data of that experiment.
I should add here, that in addition to gaining the
knowledge (after all "to know is to make more correct
decisions"), this experiment also allows you to enrich
your garden, e.g. with a new grapes, which in about
4 years later will reward your effort by growing tasty
fruit (in accordance with the described in item #C4.2
of the web page named
morals.htm
the operating principle of the "moral field", that every
morally correct effort is rewarded in the long term work
of this moral field).
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. #F1abc: Here are photographs of the leaf burnt by
radioactivity from a single droplet of rain falling randomly
and intermittently in the New Zealand town of
Petone.
Most probably these were just such single drops of rain saturated
with the burning radioactivity that cause mutations of black feathers
in NZ blackbirds described in item #T7 and shown in "Fig. #T1" from
the web page named
solar.htm,
and perhaps also such single drops are responsible for the above-described
"epidemic" of melanoma. Notice that the fact of appearing such individual
droplets containing the burning radioactive waste in rains of the distant
from rest of the world New Zealand, practically means also that similar
drops of mutating, and perhaps also carcinogenic and pathogenic rain,
probably fall in any other location on earth as well. Only that because
these are just single drops separated from each other by time and space,
their detection is very difficult (if not impossible) for professional scientists
who their profession perform only routinely, and thus who do not put into
their research and into the "hunting" for truth the entire their power of
observation, logic, and willingness of finding out even the most unpopular
truth (i.e. the truth which in the case of professional scientists has the
potential of exposing or even destroying completely their well-paid careers).
Thus, in spite of what officially state scientists and politicians, it is worth
to take into consideration my advice-warning that I gave in the motto
to item #F5 from this web page. (Click on the selected image to see it
enlarged or to shift it to another area of the screen.)
Fig. #F1a (upper):
A photo of the leaf described herein, which make
me to write item #F5 from this web page. I am documenting
it here because this leaf provides confirmation that
onto New Zealand, and thus probably also onto every
other place of the Earth, occasionally are falling with
rain single droplets full of burning radioactivity potentially
capable of causing mutations, cancer, and/or other health
problems. This leaf was positioned on the grape plant
under such a substantial angle, that this single radioactive
droplet actually only slipped over it, touching it in two
places, then sunk into the soil. Thus on a leaf remained
only a minimal proportion of its radioactive content.
But even so small its contents caused an increase in
indications of the radiation monitor - which fact is documented
and explained on the images (b) and (c). Notice that
the radioactivity of certain waste ceases extremely slow -
sometimes only after many thousands of years. Thus,
the fact that onto New Zealand
(and probably also onto every other country in the world)
currently fall with rain only single droplets full of burning
radioactive waste, does NOT mean at all, that this radioactivity
is gone, but on the contrary, it means that gradually and
unnoticeably it accumulates in the soil (similarly like slowly
and unnoticeably accumulates the effect of climate change),
and thus that over time this radioactivity may become so
ubiquitous, that it will poison all the food, while in the future
also makes dead all people! Fig. #F1b (middle):
A photo of indications of the radiation monitor placed
on a leaf discussed here. After placing this monitor on
the indicated leaf, its measurements increased by more
than 50% in relation to how much they were when in the
given and exactly the same location the radiation monitor
registered only the background radiation. (However, the
indications of radiation monitor typically change if it is
moved to a different place.) The above photograph shows
an indication amounting to 0.15 micro-Sieverts per hour
(i.e. 0.15 μS/h) - which still qualifies it to the allowed
and safe level. Of course, because the background radiation
fluctuates, also indications obtained from the leaf during
my measurement fluctuated in the range from 0.13
to 0.15 μS/h. In other locations from the garden these
indications were different. However, the leaf shown here
always gave indications that were higher than 50% over
the background radiation at a given location.
Fig. #F1c (lowest):
Another photo taken in the same location of my garden.
This time it documents only indications of the background
radiation taken a short time after the reading (b). To take
photographs shown here I purposely chose a place in my
garden, which gave the lowest background radiation, because
that particular day different places in my garden were giving
the background radiation the lowest values of which were decreasing
to a level somewhere within the range between 0.07 and
0.10 μS/h. (Notice also, that in each photograph I deliberately
taken a section of the lawn to make sure that the viewer sees that
all their measurements I carried out always in the same place of
the garden - because elsewhere garden background radiation
could be different. After all the photographing I carried out from
"freehand" that is, without using a tripod - which way of photographing,
unfortunately, makes each single photograph to cover a slightly
different angle and probably also from a slightly different height.
However, the photographing also the lawn allows the viewer to
notice arrangement of flowers and grass. This arrangement in
turn assures the viewer that measurements documented here
I took always in the same place, because the wooden plank that
I used to pad the expose of a leaf, all the time is lying and was
photographed at exactly the same area of the garden and at
the same orientation). In the above photo I showed the lowest
indication amounting to 0.07 μS/h. However, during taking
the measurements discussed herein, these indications fluctuated
within the range from 0.07 to 0.09 μS/h. In turn after inserting
the leaf under the radiation monitor, indications have always jumped
to the value of over 50% higher. (The leaves that are NOT stained
with radiation cause almost none, and certainly NOT so high, growth
of the indications of background radiation.)
Fig. #F2: Here is a photograph of a small and young grape
plant, three leaves of which have been burned in 2015 by
a highly radioactive, single drops of rain - as for the last
of these burned leaves is documented in item #F5 and
on "Fig. #F1abc" of this web page. (When burned were
the previous two leaves, I had NO yet the radiation monitor
described herein.) This grape plant enclosed by transparent
tube made of plexiglas can be seen in the lower centre of
the above photo. To illustrate its height I deliberately placed
a soft garden chair neat it. At the time of taking the photograph
shown here the plant has already grown to a height of around
60 cm from the previously high at around 25 cm a single stump
to which during the winter 2015 reduced it a voracious possum
that at nights sneaks into my garden. It is also worth noting
that I deliberately planted this grape near the pole of my
miniature "pergola" (partially visible in this photo), which
I built along the northern fence of my garden - so that while
it grows it could climb along the pole and then spread on the
upper surface of this pergola. (Click on the image to see it
enlarged or to shift it to another area of the screen.)
Part #G:
Genetic engineering:
#G1.
Problems with genetic engineering:
I already emphasized in item #E2 above,
that according to the philosophy of totalizm
in the physical world nothing has exclusively
good or exclusively bad consequences.
For example, a good consequence of kitchen
salt is that it improves the taste of meals.
But a bad consequence of the same salt
is that it increases blood pressure, increases
overweight, damages some internal organs,
etc. Therefore, the task of cautious people
is to protect themselves from everything that
is "new" until the time when "bad" consequences
of it become known, understood, and are
well under our control - and thus when people
can avoid them or counter-act them (as I recommend
this e.g. with the principle of permanent so-called
"telekinetisation" which I discovered - for details
see the web page named
tfz.htm).
However, some authorities introduce to our
fields vegetation and animals which are
products of so-called "genetic engineering"
WITHOUT awaiting until such "bad consequences"
of these experiments become well learned
by people. As a result, already at this moment
e.g. corn pollinated by wind, which genetically
engineered variety was planted in central New
Zealand, managed to pollute genetically almost
the entire corn production that grows in this
country. So practically in New Zealand does
NOT exist any more a variety of corn which
would have exclusively natural genes (e.g.
would have genes which were wisely created
and thoroughly tested by God). Similarly is
with salmon in there (i.e. with a tasty fish
which is farmed in New Zealand for export
purposes). Another known example of
similar problems are genetically engineered
varieties of rice that grow in India.
Part #H:
Antibiotics and growth enhancements:
#H1.
Problems with antibiotics, steroids, and growth enhancements:
We know that e.g. some producers of poultry
(e.g. hens) continually feed their animals with
fodder to which they always add some antibiotics,
steroids, and growth enhancements. This is
because such a fodder causes faster and
greater gain of weight in poultry. But it also
causes the appearance of "antibiotics
resistant bacteria" - and thus the return of
times when to some illnesses the humanity
ceased to have effective medicines. Furthermore,
in people who eat meat or eggs from such a
poultry, these additions to fodder cause various
undesirable "side effects", e.g. the growth of
breasts in men, the diminishing number of
sperm, difficulties in getting pregnant in
women (e.g. see item #F5 of the web page named
healing.htm),
etc., etc.
Part #I:
Impact of human industries:
#I1.
Mass extinctions:
The industrialisation pollutes our foods. For
example, the industrial catching of fish causes
destruction of seas and oceans. It is also a
reason for a mass extinction of some fishes -
for more details see item #C5 on the web page named
newzealand.htm.
In turn e.g. electromagnetic fields from our
Hand-phones resonate in bodies of bees thus
causing their extinction - for more details
see item #F1 on the web page named
telepathy.htm
and item #C5.1 on the abovementioned web page
"newzealand.htm". The excessive burning of fossil
fuels (i.e. coal and oil) causes the emission of
carbon with its murderous consequences to the
climate and to living creatures - e.g. through the
appearance of poisonous "algae" in too-hot seas
and oceans which cause that a significant proportion
of shellfish, oysters, and slugs become poisonous
for people (for details see item #K1.6 on the web page named
newzealand.htm).
#I2.
Problems with industrialization of mass food production:
To these problem we can include, for example:
(1) farming monoculture and its evil consequences
(e.g. insects resistant to pesticides, locust,
droughts, illnesses, plagues, etc.), (2) nervous
cows, pigs, hens, etc. - which in turn causes
changes in their milk, meat, eggs, etc., that
later influence negatively us - consumers,
and many other similar consequences of
industrial (mass) production of food.
#I3.
Replacement of natural processes by chemical treatments:
All natural processes are beneficial for health
and for life - e.g. see "fermentation" described
in items #B1.1 and #B1 of the web page named
korea.htm.
But the "chemical treatments" that currently are
replacing these natural processes does NOT
display the same life-giving attributes. Thus
e.g. the Polish "sauerkraut" (or even better the
Korean "kim-chi"), Polish "fermented cucumbers"
and "sour-pigenons" (i.e. "kiszone ogórki" and
"kiszone gołąbki"), or Japanese "miso" soup
all are highly beneficial for the human health.
But e.g. "pickles" (i.e. cucumbers treated
chemically with vinegar) have only a good
taste, but for the health they are NOT so
beneficial as such "fermented" food.
Part #J:
Electrical fields, magnetic radiation, life suffocation:
#J1.
Dying water and organic matter:
Just ordinary water can be "living" or "dead".
For example, the German folklore states that
in order water is "alive", it must be taken from
a source or from a well, after it "flows under
at least three hills and three forests". In turn
for water to become "dead" it suffices to
"lock" it in something for a longer period
of time, e.g. lock it in some container or in
a pipeline. On the other hand, what we do
to water today, is just locking it in waterworks
pipelines or in plastic bottles. So practically
we all drink water which is "dead". Consequences
of such a drinking "dead water" wee can see
already around us.
#J2.
Unhealthy food from under high-tension electrical power-lines:
Already now we begin to realise that many
people who live under high-tension electrical
power-lines, with the elapse of time get
cancers. So by analogy we can predict that
also food that grows under such power-lines
will NOT be equally healthy as food that grew
in natural environments.
Part #K:
Immoral politicians and their destructive decisions:
Present politician, similarly like the majority
of decision makers, currently almost exclusively
make decisions along the so-called "line of
the least resistance". It means, make decisions
which try to please reach and influential people,
concerns, voters, other decision makers, but
which do NOT solve problems. From findings
of so-called "philosophy of totalizm" it is already
known, that all decisions which run "along the
line of least resistance" are "immoral",
in turn as such they must later be repaired, while
in the meantime they make a lot of harm - for
more details see item #A2.1 on the web page named
totalizm.htm.
In the result, immoral politicians and their destructive
decisions only make worse the situation with food.
Guidelines of the "philosophy of totalizm" about
principles of making "moral decisions", and thus
making correct decisions - which never later require
correcting and repair of their consequences,
are described, amongst others, in item #A2.1
of the web page named
totalizm.htm,
and also in item #F1 of the web page named
rok_uk.htm.
#K1.
Political decisions which destroy food:
Food is destroyed e.g. by
wars,
monopoles,
prices politics,
taxes,
introduction of unnatural additions, etc. -
all this is a product of immoral politicians.
A good example of just such destructive to
food political decisions is the present politics
of European Union - where farmers are paid
for NOT planting their fields (in spite that
inhabitants of many countries of the world
still are hungry), or the described in item
#D5 of the web page named
fruit.htm.
custom of many "monopolistic food producers"
to destroy a part of produced food only in order
to cause an increase in prices.
Part #L:
Ignorance and arrogance of scientists who monopolise decision making processes:
#L1.
What we already know that scientists still do NOT know about food:
Energies "yin" and "yang", "feng-shui", etc. -
for more information see items #B2 to #B4
from the web page named
fruit.htm.
Part #M:
Whether the humanity is endangered by the "death through hunger and starvation"?
#M1.
Premises about the "death by hunger and starvation" of the entire humanity:
There is a lot old prophecies on this subject.
Their example can be an old Polish prophecy
described in items #H1 and #H2 of the web page named
prophecies.htm.
In turn one amongst mechanisms which can
cause such a "death of the entire humanity by
starvation" is the current mass extinction of
bees already described in item #I1 above
on this web page.
Part #N:
Is there any hope (in spite of all the above)?
#N1.
Sources of hope:
Motto:
"It is enough to walk along a street of any city from a rich country of Orient,
to see with our own eyes the superiority of their philosophy of eating over
Western philosophies."
The most vital sources of hope for the future include:
(1) The existence of Oriental philosophies which concern food and eating
(this is why it is worth to learn these Oriental philosophies concerning food).
There is a number of vital factors which define the quality of food in philosophies
of the Orient.
In past inhabitants of rich countries of the
West scoffed at inhabitants of the Orient, that
these are so "lean" and look as if
they are "starving". But then it turned out that
"being lean" is an "advantage", NOT a "fault".
After all, it means health, long life, the lack
of visits in doctors and hospitals, more natural
feelings and habits, etc., etc.
(2) The existence of the principle (and a method) of
God's acting to "always provide evidence in support of
whatever believes strongly" - see the web pages referred
in item #O1 below.
(3) The existence proven in action during centuries
of use perfect recipes on traditional dishes.
(4) The existence of traditions of good eating.
Part #O:
What we ourselves can do in order to improve the situation with foods:
#O1.
Directions of our actions:
The most vital directions on which we all
should concentrate to improve the present
(tragic) situation with foods, are as follows:
- Increase of morality - as the
"morality is the key to everything"
(e.g. see items #A3 and #B4 from the web page
morals.htm,
item #A1 on the web page named
totalizm.htm,
item #P1 on the web page named
changelings.htm,
or item #B5 on the web page named
seismograph.htm),
- Eliminate monopoles (e.g. see items
#C1 and #M1.3 from the web page named
telekinetics.htm),
-Learn and understand methods of God's
actions (e.g. see item #A2.2 on the web page named
totalizm.htm
or se the entire web page named
god_exists.htm),
- Help so-called "whistle blowers" - i.e.
people who sound alarm and turn attention
of others on truth regarding immoral practices
of other people (e.g. see item #F1 on the web page
totalizm.htm),
- Cultivate traditions of good food consumed
throughout many years by healthy people,
- Cultivate the tradition of natural production of foods,
- Seek new knowledge about food (of the kind
of Oriental philosophies of foods: "yin" and "yang", "feng-shui", etc.).
Part #P:
So what we should see in food that we consume:
#P1.
What we already know that it influences positively our health:
Theoretically we already know a lot of facts
on the subject of what influences positively
our health. Examples of these facts can be:
- Tradition of "checking effects in
centuries-old action" described e.g. in
items #B2 to #B4 of the web page named
fruit.htm, or
- Fermented food such as Korean
"kim-chi", Japanese "miso", Polish "kiszone
gołąbki z kaszą" or "sauerkraut", described
here in item #I3 (and also e.g. in items
#B1.1 and #B1 of the web page named
korea.htm).
Currently we need to try to implement this theoretical
knowledge to everyday practice of our eating.
Part #R:
Creation of our private "cookbooks" with dishes worth trouble of making them:
#R1.
Let us record traditions of good food before these disappear:
Means, let us write down thoroughly old
recipes for dishes used by our grand-parents
and parents.
#R2.
What is worth being recorded in our family "cookbooks":
Let us write for ourselves a "cookbook" which
contains recipes for traditional, healthy,
home-made, energy-balanced, food for
our everyday use.
Part #S:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#S1.
Summary of this web page:
This web page provided examples of replies
and recipes for a healthy and tasty food.
It revealed to us also various benefits that
stem from finding recipes for just such dishes.
#S2.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
Current email addresses to the author of
this web page, i.e. officially to
Dr Eng. Jan Pajak
while courteously to Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak,
at which readers can post possible comments,
opinions, descriptions, or information which in
their opinion I should learn, are provided on the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.htm
(for its version in the HTML language), or the web page named
pajak_jan_uk.pdf
(for the version of the web page "pajak_jan_uk.pdf"
in safe PDF format - which safe PDF versions
of further web pages by the author can also be
downloaded via links from item #B1 of the web page named
text_11.htm).
The author's right for the use of courteous
title of "Professor" stems from the custom that
"with professors is like with generals", namely
when someone is
once a professor, than he or she courteously
remains a professor forever. In
turn the author of this web page was a professor
at 4 different universities, i.e. at 3 of them,
from 1 September 1992 untill 31 October 1998,
as an "Associate Professor" from English-based
educational system, while on one university as
a (Full) "Professor" (since 1 March 2007 till
31 December 2007 - means at the last place
of employment in his professional life).
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
This web page is also available in the form
of a brochure marked [11], which
is prepared in "PDF" ("Portable Document
Format") - currently considered to be the
most safe amongst all internet formats, as
normally viruses cannot cling to PDF. This
clear brochure is ready both, for printing,
as well as for reading from a computer
screen. It also has all its
green links
still active. Thus, if it is read from the computer
screen connected to internet, then after clicking
onto these green links, the linked web pages
and illustrations will open. Unfortunately, because
the volume of it is around a double of the volume
of web page which this brochure publishes,
the memory limitations on a significant number
of free servers which I use, do NOT allow to
offer it from them (so if it does NOT download
from this address, because it is NOT available
on this server, then you should click onto any
other address from
Menu 3,
and then check whether in there it is available).
In order to open this brochure (and/or download
it to own computer), it suffices to either click on
the following green link
or to open from any totaliztic web site the
PDF file named as in the above green link.
If the reader wishes to check, whether some other
totaliztic web page which he or she just is studying,
is also available in the form of such PDF brochure,
then should check whether it is listed amongst links
from "part #B" of the web page named
text_11.htm.
This is because links from there indicate all totaliztic
web pages, which are already published as such
brochures from series [11] in PDF format.
I wish you a fruitful reading!
Date of initiation this web page: 15 August 2011
Date of the most recent update: 7 May 2021
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
English: If you prefer to read in a different language, click on the selected flag or
green link below
Po polsku: Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w odmiennym języku, kliknij na wybraną flagę lub
zielony link poniżej
